# Technical Document Analysis of Bar Chart
## Image Description
The image is a **bar chart** comparing the **average number of banks needing mitigation** across multiple categories and thresholds. The chart uses **patterned bars** (solid, diagonal, crosshatch) to distinguish between three PRAC versions (PRAC-1, PRAC-2, PRAC-4) and their associated thresholds (64, 128, 256). The y-axis represents the metric, while the x-axis lists categorical labels.
---
## Key Trends and Data Points
1. **General Pattern**:
- Most bars hover around **1.00**, indicating minimal mitigation needs for most categories.
- **450.soplex** exhibits a significant outlier, with values reaching **~1.12** for PRAC-4 (Th=64).
2. **Threshold Effects**:
- Higher thresholds (e.g., Th=256) generally correlate with **lower values** compared to lower thresholds (e.g., Th=64).
- Example: PRAC-1 (Th=64) values are consistently higher than PRAC-1 (Th=128/256).
3. **Category-Specific Observations**:
- **450.soplex**: PRAC-4 (Th=64) peaks at **~1.12**, while other thresholds drop to ~1.00.
- **437.leslie3d**: PRAC-1 (Th=64) shows a slight increase (~1.01) compared to other thresholds.
- **470.lbm**: PRAC-4 (Th=64) has a minor spike (~1.01).
---
## Legend and Axis Labels
- **Legend** (top-right):
- **PRAC-1**: Dark blue (solid bars).
- **PRAC-2**: Gray (diagonal bars).
- **PRAC-4**: Red (crosshatch bars).
- Thresholds: 64, 128, 256.
- **X-Axis Labels** (categories):
- 429.mcf, 433.milc, 434.zeusmp, 437.leslie3d, 450.soplex, 459.GemsFDTD, 470.lbm, 519.lbm, 520.omnetpp, 549.fotonik3d, bfs_cm2003, bfs_dblp, bfs_ny, gups, h264_encode.
- **Y-Axis Label**:
`Avg. Num. of Banks Needing Mitigation`
---
## Data Table Reconstruction
| Category | PRAC-1 (Th=64) | PRAC-1 (Th=128) | PRAC-1 (Th=256) | PRAC-2 (Th=64) | PRAC-2 (Th=128) | PRAC-2 (Th=256) | PRAC-4 (Th=64) | PRAC-4 (Th=128) | PRAC-4 (Th=256) |
|--------------------|----------------|-----------------|-----------------|----------------|-----------------|-----------------|----------------|-----------------|-----------------|
| 429.mcf | ~1.01 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 |
| 433.milc | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 |
| 434.zeusmp | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 |
| 437.leslie3d | ~1.01 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 |
| 450.soplex | ~1.10 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.11 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.12 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 |
| 459.GemsFDTD | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 |
| 470.lbm | ~1.01 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.01 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 |
| 519.lbm | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 |
| 520.omnetpp | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 |
| 549.fotonik3d | ~1.01 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.01 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 |
| bfs_cm2003 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 |
| bfs_dblp | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 |
| bfs_ny | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 |
| gups | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 |
| h264_encode | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 | ~1.00 |
---
## Spatial Grounding and Verification
- **Legend Placement**: Top-right corner, aligned with bar patterns.
- **Color Consistency**:
- PRAC-1 (dark blue) = solid bars.
- PRAC-2 (gray) = diagonal bars.
- PRAC-4 (red) = crosshatch bars.
- **Trend Verification**:
- PRAC-4 (Th=64) consistently shows the highest values (e.g., 450.soplex: ~1.12).
- Thresholds inversely correlate with values (e.g., PRAC-1 Th=64 > Th=128 > Th=256).
---
## Conclusion
The chart highlights that **PRAC-4 (Th=64)** generally requires the most mitigation, with **450.soplex** being the most critical category. Thresholds significantly influence mitigation needs, with higher thresholds reducing the average number of banks requiring intervention.
