# Technical Document Extraction: GPU Throughput Analysis ## Chart Description This image is a **line chart** comparing the throughput performance of two GPU models (A100 and V100) across varying computational loads (denoted as "m"). The chart visualizes throughput in teraflops per second (TFLOP/s) against the parameter "m". --- ### Axis Labels and Markers - **X-axis (Horizontal):** - Label: `m` - Markers: `0`, `2000`, `4000`, `6000`, `8000` - **Y-axis (Vertical):** - Label: `Throughput (TFLOP/s)` - Markers: `0`, `50`, `100`, `150`, `200` --- ### Legend - **Placement:** Right side of the chart (outside the plot area). - **Labels and Colors:** - `A100` (Blue line with circular markers) - `V100` (Orange line with circular markers) --- ### Data Series and Trends #### A100 (Blue Line) - **Trend:** Steep upward curve, indicating exponential growth in throughput as "m" increases. - **Data Points (x, y):** - (0, 0) - (1000, 30) - (2000, 120) - (4000, 170) - (8000, 210) #### V100 (Orange Line) - **Trend:** Gradual upward slope, indicating linear growth in throughput as "m" increases. - **Data Points (x, y):** - (0, 0) - (1000, 10) - (2000, 60) - (4000, 80) - (8000, 90) --- ### Key Observations 1. **Performance Gap:** - A100 consistently outperforms V100 across all values of "m". - At "m = 8000", A100 achieves **210 TFLOP/s**, while V100 achieves **90 TFLOP/s**. 2. **Scalability:** - A100 demonstrates superior scalability, with throughput increasing by **~180 TFLOP/s** from "m = 0" to "m = 8000". - V100 shows minimal improvement, with throughput rising only **~80 TFLOP/s** over the same range. --- ### Spatial Grounding - **Legend Position:** Right-aligned, outside the plot area. - **Data Point Verification:** - Blue markers (A100) align with the blue line. - Orange markers (V100) align with the orange line. --- ### Notes - No additional text, tables, or embedded diagrams are present. - All textual information is in **English**. - The chart focuses on quantitative performance metrics without qualitative annotations.