# Technical Data Extraction: Model Safety Comparison Chart
## 1. Document Overview
This image is a stacked bar chart comparing the safety performance of two AI models, **Nano Banana Pro** and **Seeddream 4.5**, across various content categories. The chart measures the percentage distribution of three response types: Refusal, Unsafe, and Safe.
## 2. Component Isolation
### A. Header / Legend
Located at the top of the image.
* **Response Categories (Colors):**
* **Light Grey:** Refusal
* **Light Red/Pink:** Unsafe
* **Light Blue:** Safe
* **Model Indicators (Textures):**
* **Solid Fill:** Nano Banana Pro
* **Diagonal Hatching (Striped):** Seeddream 4.5
### B. Main Chart Area
* **Y-Axis:** Labeled "Percentage (%)". Scale ranges from 0 to 100 with horizontal gridlines at 0, 50, and 100.
* **X-Axis:** Contains 9 categories of content.
* **Data Structure:** Each category contains two side-by-side stacked bars. The left bar (solid) represents Nano Banana Pro; the right bar (hatched) represents Seeddream 4.5.
### C. X-Axis Categories (Labels)
1. Disturbing
2. Hate
3. Humiliation
4. Illegal Activity
5. IP (Intellectual Property)
6. Public Figures
7. Sexual
8. Violence
9. Average (Summary Metric)
## 3. Data Table Reconstruction
*Note: Values are estimated based on visual alignment with the percentage scale.*
| Category | Model | Refusal (%) | Unsafe (%) | Safe (%) |
| :--- | :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: |
| **Disturbing** | Nano Banana Pro | ~8% | ~78% | ~14% |
| | Seeddream 4.5 | ~8% | ~76% | ~16% |
| **Hate** | Nano Banana Pro | ~38% | ~32% | ~30% |
| | Seeddream 4.5 | ~28% | ~52% | ~20% |
| **Humiliation** | Nano Banana Pro | ~14% | ~38% | ~48% |
| | Seeddream 4.5 | ~15% | ~50% | ~35% |
| **Illegal Activity** | Nano Banana Pro | ~8% | ~38% | ~54% |
| | Seeddream 4.5 | ~16% | ~61% | ~23% |
| **IP** | Nano Banana Pro | ~1% | ~24% | ~75% |
| | Seeddream 4.5 | ~1% | ~49% | ~50% |
| **Public Figures** | Nano Banana Pro | ~1% | ~37% | ~62% |
| | Seeddream 4.5 | ~25% | ~13% | ~62% |
| **Sexual** | Nano Banana Pro | ~24% | ~8% | ~68% |
| | Seeddream 4.5 | ~52% | ~20% | ~28% |
| **Violence** | Nano Banana Pro | ~15% | ~70% | ~15% |
| | Seeddream 4.5 | ~23% | ~70% | ~7% |
| **Average** | **Nano Banana Pro** | **~21%** | **~40%** | **~39%** |
| | **Seeddream 4.5** | **~22%** | **~52%** | **~26%** |
## 4. Trend Analysis and Observations
### Model Comparison Trends
* **Nano Banana Pro (Solid):** Generally shows a higher "Safe" (Blue) percentage across most categories, particularly in IP, Illegal Activity, and Humiliation. It has a very high "Unsafe" rate in the "Disturbing" and "Violence" categories.
* **Seeddream 4.5 (Hatched):** Tends to have a higher "Unsafe" (Red) percentage overall. In the "Sexual" and "Public Figures" categories, it utilizes "Refusal" (Grey) much more aggressively than Nano Banana Pro.
### Category Specifics
* **Highest Safety:** Nano Banana Pro performs best in "IP" (~75% safe).
* **Highest Risk:** Both models struggle significantly with "Disturbing" and "Violence," where the "Unsafe" red block dominates the bar.
* **Refusal Strategy:** Seeddream 4.5's primary defense against "Sexual" content is refusal (~52%), whereas Nano Banana Pro marks the majority of that same content as "Safe" (~68%).
### Summary (Average)
On average, **Nano Banana Pro** produces more "Safe" results (~39% vs ~26%) and fewer "Unsafe" results (~40% vs ~52%) compared to **Seeddream 4.5**. Both models maintain a similar average "Refusal" rate (~21-22%).
