# Technical Document Extraction: ALFWorld Success Rate Analysis
## Chart Title
**(a) ALFWorld Success Rate**
## Axes
- **X-axis**: Trial Number (0 to 10, integer increments)
- **Y-axis**: Proportion of Solved Environments (0.5 to 1.0, 0.1 increments)
## Legend
- **Location**: Top-left corner
- **Entries**:
1. `ReAct only` (dashed gray line)
2. `ReAct + Reflexion (Heuristic)` (solid blue line)
3. `ReAct + Reflexion (GPT)` (solid green line)
## Data Series Analysis
### 1. ReAct only (dashed gray)
- **Trend**: Gradual upward slope, plateauing after Trial 6
- **Data Points**:
- Trial 0: 0.62
- Trial 2: 0.72
- Trial 4: 0.74
- Trial 6: 0.76
- Trial 8: 0.76
- Trial 10: 0.76
### 2. ReAct + Reflexion (Heuristic) (solid blue)
- **Trend**: Steep upward trajectory, surpassing all other lines by Trial 6
- **Data Points**:
- Trial 0: 0.65
- Trial 2: 0.82
- Trial 4: 0.87
- Trial 6: 0.91
- Trial 8: 0.95
- Trial 10: 0.97
### 3. ReAct + Reflexion (GPT) (solid green)
- **Trend**: Consistent upward slope, closely following Heuristic line after Trial 6
- **Data Points**:
- Trial 0: 0.63
- Trial 2: 0.81
- Trial 4: 0.85
- Trial 6: 0.89
- Trial 8: 0.92
- Trial 10: 0.94
## Key Observations
1. **Performance Gaps**:
- ReAct only (gray) remains 20-30% below Reflexion-enhanced methods throughout trials
- Heuristic (blue) outperforms GPT (green) by ~3% at Trial 10
2. **Acceleration Points**:
- All methods show steepest gains between Trials 4-6
- Heuristic line exhibits sharpest increase (0.87 → 0.91) between Trials 4-6
3. **Convergence**:
- GPT and Heuristic lines diverge minimally after Trial 8 (0.92 vs 0.95)
## Spatial Grounding
- Legend occupies 15% of top-left quadrant
- Data points aligned with legend colors:
- Gray markers: ReAct only
- Blue circles: Heuristic
- Green squares: GPT
## Trend Verification
- All lines exhibit monotonic increase
- Heuristic line slope > GPT line slope > ReAct only line slope
- No downward trends observed in any series
