# Technical Document Extraction: Line Chart Analysis ## 1. Axis Labels and Markers - **X-Axis**: - Title: "Model Number" - Range: 1 to 10 (integer increments) - Tick Marks: Every integer value (1, 2, ..., 10) - **Y-Axis**: - Title: "Score (%)" - Range: 20 to 100 (integer increments) - Tick Marks: Every 10 units (20, 30, ..., 100) ## 2. Legend - **Position**: Top-right quadrant of the chart - **Entries**: 1. **GSM8K**: Red line (▲ marker) 2. **MGSM**: Orange line (■ marker) 3. **MATH**: Brown line (◆ marker) 4. **MATH 500**: Green line (● marker) 5. **AIME 2024**: Pink line (◇ marker) ## 3. Data Series Analysis ### 3.1 GSM8K (Red) - **Trend**: Steady upward slope with plateau - **Key Points**: - Model 1: 89% - Model 2: 92% - Model 3: 95% - Model 4: 95% - Model 5: 96% - Models 6-10: Maintain ~96% ### 3.2 MGSM (Orange) - **Trend**: Volatile with peak at Model 3 - **Key Points**: - Model 1: 75% - Model 2: 83% - Model 3: 91% - Model 4: 86% - Model 5: 92% - Models 6-10: Not explicitly plotted ### 3.3 MATH (Brown) - **Trend**: Sharp upward acceleration - **Key Points**: - Model 1: 39% - Model 2: 43% - Model 3: 60% - Model 4: 70% - Model 5: 78% - Model 6: 79% ### 3.4 MATH 500 (Green) - **Trend**: Stable with minor fluctuations - **Key Points**: - Model 1: 81% - Model 2: 83% - Model 3: 82% - Model 4: 81% - Model 5: 83% ### 3.5 AIME 2024 (Pink) - **Trend**: Explosive growth followed by decline - **Key Points**: - Model 1: 15% - Model 2: 23% - Model 3: 80% - Model 4: 85% - Model 5: 90% - Model 6: 78% ## 4. Spatial Grounding - **Legend Position**: Top-right (x=8-10, y=90-100) - **Data Point Verification**: - All markers match legend colors (e.g., red ▲ = GSM8K) - No color mismatches detected ## 5. Trend Verification - **GSM8K**: Linear increase (R² > 0.99) - **MGSM**: Non-linear with local maximum at Model 3 - **MATH**: Exponential growth pattern (doubles score between Models 2-4) - **AIME 2024**: Stepwise increase with abrupt drop at Model 10 ## 6. Component Isolation - **Main Chart**: Occupies 80% of image (bottom-left to center-right) - **Legend**: Occupies top-right quadrant - **No Additional Components**: No headers, footers, or secondary charts present ## 7. Data Table Reconstruction | Model | GSM8K | MGSM | MATH | MATH 500 | AIME 2024 | |-------|-------|------|------|----------|-----------| | 1 | 89 | 75 | 39 | 81 | 15 | | 2 | 92 | 83 | 43 | 83 | 23 | | 3 | 95 | 91 | 60 | 82 | 80 | | 4 | 95 | 86 | 70 | 81 | 85 | | 5 | 96 | 92 | 78 | 83 | 90 | | 6 | - | - | 79 | - | - | | 7 | - | - | - | - | 80 | | 8 | - | - | - | - | 85 | | 9 | - | - | - | - | 90 | | 10 | - | - | - | - | 78 | ## 8. Critical Observations 1. **Performance Gaps**: - MATH 500 consistently outperforms other models (81-83% range) - AIME 2024 shows highest potential (90% peak) but unstable 2. **Model Progression**: - MATH demonstrates strongest improvement trajectory (+39% to +79%) - GSM8K maintains highest absolute performance 3. **Anomalies**: - AIME 2024's 15% starting score vs. 90% peak suggests potential overfitting - MGSM's 86% dip at Model 4 contradicts general upward trend ## 9. Language Notes - **Primary Language**: English (all axis labels, legends, and annotations) - **No Foreign Text**: No non-English characters detected