2601.22831

# Toward Pluralizing Reflection in HCI through Daoism **Authors**: Aaron Pengyu Zhu, Kristina Mah, Janghee Cho > Division of Industrial Design National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore > Design Lab, School of Architecture, Design and Planning The University of Sydney Sydney Australia by (2026) ## Abstract Reflection is fundamental to how people make sense of everyday life, helping them navigate moments of growth, uncertainty, and change. Yet in HCI, existing frameworks of designing technologies to support reflection remain narrow, emphasizing cognitive, rational problem-solving, and individual self-improvement. We introduce Daoist philosophy as a non-Western lens to broaden this scope and reimagine reflective practices in interactive systems. Combining insights from Daoist literature with semi-structured interviews with 18 Daoist priests, scholars, and practitioners, we identified three key dimensions of everyday reflection: Stillness, Resonance, and Emergence. These dimensions reveal emergent, embodied, relational, and ethically driven qualities often overlooked in HCI research. We articulate their potential to inform alternative frameworks for interactive systems for reflection, advocating a shift from reflection toward reflecting-with, and highlight the potential of Daoism as an epistemological resource for the HCI community. Reflection, Daoism, reflective HCI, embodiment, meaning-making, post-humanism journalyear: 2026 copyright: cc conference: Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; April 13–17, 2026; Barcelona, Spain booktitle: Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’26), April 13–17, 2026, Barcelona, Spain doi: 10.1145/3772318.3790853 isbn: 979-8-4007-2278-3/2026/04 ccs: Human-centered computing HCI theory, concepts and models ccs: Human-centered computing Empirical studies in HCI ## 1. Introduction In contemporary contexts, where people increasingly encounter the unknown through technological transformation, ecological crises, and public health challenges, reflection as a meaning-making process becomes more critical than reliance on quick fixes or problem-solution thinking. This echoes Schön’s critique of technical rationality (Schön, 1984) and highlights the importance of reflective engagement for navigating uncertainties of life and sustaining well-being (Mols et al., 2016; Sengers et al., 2005; Soden et al., 2022; Light et al., 2017). Recognizing this, Human Computer Interaction (HCI) has increasingly focused on reflection as a key concern, framing it not only as a conceptual lens but also as a core design goal (Sas and Dix, 2009; Bentvelzen et al., 2022). This has led to the development of various interactive systems—including personal informatics (PI) tools (Li et al., 2010; Epstein et al., 2015; Cho and et al., 2022; Choe et al., 2017), mixed reality applications (Wagener et al., 2025; Ahn et al., 2025; Jiang and Ahmadpour, 2022), AI-driven systems (Kocielnik et al., 2018; Lyu et al., 2025), tangible interfaces (Mols et al., 2020; Rajcic and McCormack, 2020; Sathya and Nakagaki, 2024), and social media platforms (Bae et al., 2014) —typically designed to foster self-awareness, behavior change, or critical perspectives on everyday practices (Li et al., 2010; Fleck and Fitzpatrick, 2010; Baumer et al., 2014; Lim et al., 2019). Yet, despite the importance of reflection, the conceptualization of reflection in HCI remains narrow and fragmented (Baumer, 2015; Bentvelzen et al., 2022). Reflection is frequently defined as a staged process of individual insight or reduced to the act of reviewing data in PI systems (Baumer et al., 2014). This narrowing of reflection could limit how technologies support people in making sense of experiences and cultivating meaningful practices. Much of HCI research assumes idealized conditions, such as users being motivated, attentive, and cognitively available when engaging in reflective practices (Spiel et al., 2018; Kersten-van Dijk et al., 2017). However, people’s everyday situations are often messy, contingent, and saturated with competing demands, leaving little time or cognitive space for deliberate reflection (Dourish and Bell, 2011; Mols et al., 2020). Consequently, the challenge is not merely to prompt reflection, but to support its unfolding within the realities of everyday life. Even when systems successfully elicit reflection, they rarely sustain in-depth reflection and may at times generate unintended negative consequences (Baumer et al., 2014; Luo et al., 2025; Loerakker et al., 2024; Eikey et al., 2021). Furthermore, existing frameworks are often rooted in Western epistemological traditions (Schön, 1984; Dewey, 1997; Moon, 2013; Baumer, 2015; Sengers et al., 2005), emphasizing cognition-driven, rational problem-solving, and individual self-improvement. This often overlooks the embodied, relational, existential, and culturally situated dimensions of reflective practice (Kaptelinin, 2018; Núñez-Pacheco, 2018; Ibrahim et al., 2024). Research programs, such as critical technical practice (Sengers et al., 2005; Agre, 2014), feminist HCI (Bardzell, 2010), and entanglement HCI (Frauenberger, 2019), call for alternative ways of knowing and living that resist modernist pursuits of technological solutionism. They emphasize interdependence, openness to uncertainty, situated knowledge, and coexistence with non-human entities (Lu et al., 2023; Haraway, 2013a, b; Lindtner et al., 2018; Livio and Devendorf, 2022; Tsing, 2015; Forlano, 2017). They challenge the anthropocentirc functionalism that prioritizes efficiency and the appropriation of the world’s resources (Bardzell et al., 2021), as well as technological reductionism in dominant Western paradigms (Cunningham et al., 2023; Van Koningsbruggen et al., 2024; Frauenberger, 2016; Law et al., 2015). Rather than offering a single cohesive framework, these approaches open up plural alternatives that operate cohesively in theory, values and design practices. Building on these calls for alternative epistemologies, we turn to Daoism as a non-Western tradition of thought and practice to pluralize how reflection is conceptualized and designed in HCI. Rather than seeking to supplant Western traditions, we approach it as an underexplored perspective that complements and extends ongoing research on reflection. Daoism introduces qualities often overlooked in cognitive or instrumental framings, articulating reflection as a relational process grounded in harmony and ethics (Tan, 2020b). Through philosophical concepts such as the Dao and Wu-Wei (effortless action), reflection can be reimagined not as the pursuit of mastery or a solutionist end-point, but as balance, receptivity, and interconnection, opening possibilities for designers to engage plural perspectives (Mah et al., 2025). To explore this potential, we examine Daoism’s contribution to HCI through the following research question: how does Daoism conceptualize reflection in ways that move beyond dominant HCI framings? Building on this analysis, we further discuss how Daoist principles could inspire alternative design directions for technologies that support reflection. To ground our inquiry and to explore how Daoism can serve as a method of everyday reflection, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 scholars, priests, and practitioners. Our research describes how participants’ reflective processes in daily life are supported by Daoist embodied practices and mindsets inspired by its teachings, with a close focus on the body, situation, and perceiving others through becoming permeable. We identified three key components of reflection: Stillness, Resonance, and Emergence. We present these as critical dimensions of a Daoist reflective paradigm, offering an alternative complement to existing HCI frameworks for reflection-supportive technology design (Fleck and Fitzpatrick, 2010; Baumer, 2015; Slovák et al., 2017). We discuss design implications inspired by dimensions of Daoist reflective practices and further extend our argument by exploring Daoist epistemology as an alternative foundation for HCI. This paper has three main contributions: (1) It introduces Daoism as a rich non-Western theoretical perspective that expands and repositions the concept of reflection in HCI to the broader HCI community; (2) It identifies three dimensions of Daoist reflection that could complement existing framework of reflection in HCI; (3) By drawing on Daoism as an ethico-onto-epistemology (Barad, 2007), it articulates design implications for reflective technologies, positioning Daoist reflection as an alternative framework that highlights the entanglement of self, others, and situations. ## 2. Related Work ### 2.1. What is Reflection? Reflection is often described as a conscious, deliberative cognitive process (Dewey, 1997; Grant et al., 2002), yet it can also be improvised and informed by tacit knowledge (Schön, 1984). Despite its value across disciplines, the concept remains ambiguous and contested (Clarà, 2015; Fleck and Fitzpatrick, 2010; Thompson and Pascal, 2012) reflecting its multifaceted nature (Baumer, 2015). Moon (Moon, 2013) notes that activities such as reasoning, reviewing, problem-solving, or critical reflection are often treated as synonymous, with meanings shaped by the goals and theoretical traditions of each field. Consequently, reflection is often invoked with different meanings and for different purposes, depending on the intended goals and the theoretical or disciplinary framework in which it is situated. In this work, we focus not on the outcomes of reflection but on its notion of reflection as it unfolds in everyday life, rather than in settings intentionally designed to provoke it (e.g., classrooms). We adopt a broad working definition to capture its diverse, situated, and often spontaneous character (Mekler and Hornbæk, 2019). Prior HCI work has addressed everyday reflection as thinking concerning day-to-day activities, with an emphasis on more critical and deliberate thought processes (Mols et al., 2016, 2020). Building on these perspectives, we draw on Donald Schön (Schön, 1984), who frames reflection as a spontaneous conversation between individuals and the materials of their practice. His notion highlights the value of reflection in addressing the complexity, uncertainty, instability, uniqueness, and value conflicts that people encounter in everyday life. From this perspective, reflection is not a prescriptive or linear process; rather, it emerges from noticing, reframing, and exploring alternative ways of understanding one’s experiences and actions (Cho et al., 2021; Tsing, 2015; Leigh and Bailey, 2013). Accordingly, we adopt the following working definition: Reflection is a meaning-making process enacted through a conversation between a person and their experiences, an object, others, or a situation. ### 2.2. Tracing Reflection in HCI: Frameworks and Technologies With the third-wave turn in HCI (Bødker, 2006), reflection has gained traction as both an analytical lens and a design goal (Baumer et al., 2014; Baumer, 2015; Fleck and Fitzpatrick, 2010; Sas and Dix, 2009), motivating the development of conceptual frameworks and interactive systems that support reflective practice. #### 2.2.1. Theoretical Frameworks for Designing Reflection Reflection in HCI has been articulated through conceptual frameworks that inform design. Fleck and Fitzpatrick synthesized traditions from education and psychology into five levels of reflection (Fleck and Fitzpatrick, 2010): revisiting (R0), reflective description (R1), dialogic reflection (R2), transformative reflection (R3), and critical reflection (R4) by synthesizing traditions of reflective practice from education and psychology into a framework. Drawing philosophical, cognitive, educational, and critical traditions, Baumer proposed “reflective informatics”, framing reflection through breakdown, inquiry, and transformation (Baumer, 2015). Slovák et al. (Epstein et al., 2020) extended Schön’s reflective practicum into social-emotional learning, offering design guidelines for transformative reflection. These frameworks have become influential in HCI as practical vocabularies for designing technologies, though these guidelines remain challenging to implement (Epstein et al., 2020). #### 2.2.2. Design Space: Interactive Systems for Reflection Building on conceptual frameworks, HCI has explored a diverse design space of interactive systems to support reflection. PI tools have long been central, enabling users to collect and visualize data for self-knowledge and behavior change (Li et al., 2010). Lived informatics expanded this model by foregrounding the ongoing practices of deciding, tracking, and integrating data into daily life (Epstein et al., 2015). Yet the reflection stage itself often remains under-theorized, with systems assuming that insight naturally follows access to data (Baumer et al., 2014). Later work examined how commercial PI features align with different levels of reflection (Cho and et al., 2022), emphasizing subjectivity and customizability, while existential models of behavior change highlight reflection on meaning, context, and lifecycles (Rapp and Boldi, 2023). In recent years, emerging technologies have expanded the design space of reflection. For instance, XR has been explored as a medium for reflection with its immersive qualities, designed for personal challenges (Wagener et al., 2023), emotional expression (Stefanidi et al., 2024; Wagener et al., 2025), mood regulation (Wagener et al., 2024), and introspection (Ahn et al., 2025). Jiang and Ahmadpour further proposed the RIOR model (Readiness, Immersive estrangement, Observation and re-examination, Repatterning) to conceptualize how VR can scaffold reflective opportunities (Jiang and Ahmadpour, 2022). AI has likewise been investigated for its reflective potential, as dialogue and questioning provide effective scaffolds for reflection. Recent work has leveraged LLMs-based chatbots to support dialogue-driven reflection (Karaturhan et al., 2024), explored AI-generated imagery as a means of co-interpreting personal data (Park et al., 2025), and examined how generative systems can foster self-exploration, self-expression, and collective rituals (Jeon et al., 2025; Shi et al., 2024; Rajcic and McCormack, 2023). In parallel, slow technology (Hallnäs and Redström, 2001; Odom et al., 2012a) has advanced a different orientation by emphasizing deliberate, unhurried, and embodied engagements with reflection. Artifacts such as Photobox (Odom et al., 2012b), the long-living chair (Pschetz and Banks, 2013), and Olly (Odom et al., 2019) encourage reflection through anticipation, subtle temporality, and re-experiencing everyday materials. Soma design similarly focuses on the “slow process” of bodily experience (Tsaknaki et al., 2021; Loke and Schiphorst, 2018), helping users to experience and become aware of their bodies in ways intimately intertwined with daily activities. Núñez-Pacheco introduced “reflection through inner presence” as a sensitizing concept (Núñez-Pacheco, 2018), emphasizing subtle bodily sensations and tacit knowledge as resources for more nuanced reflective experiences in soma design and embodied interaction. Synthesizing across such developments, Bentvelzen et al. (Bentvelzen et al., 2022) reviewed prototypes and applications designed to support reflection, identifying four design resources (i.e., temporal perspective, conversation, comparison, and discovery) that illustrate how interactive systems could foster reflection. #### 2.2.3. Epistemological Assumptions and Gaps in HCI Approaches to Reflection Although these diverse systems demonstrate a wide range of strategies and resources for supporting reflection, they expose critical gaps in how reflection is supported in practice. In a recent meta review of PI systems, Luo et al. (Luo et al., 2025) identified unintended consequences in PI systems, including cognitive burdens, emotional strain, counterproductive behaviors, and tensions with social practices. For instance, by highlighting only isolated information such as consumed calories in numerical form, current weight loss apps have been shown to exacerbate eating disorder behaviors (Eikey and Reddy, 2017). Similarly, Kersten-van Dijk et al. found that standardized visualizations (e.g., the “10,000 steps a day” rule) can bias users’ interpretations of their data, creating problematic mismatches between system feedback and self-perception (van Dijk et al., 2016). These challenges are further compounded by complex user–technology relationships. Users often perceive technological systems as authoritative (Sengers and Gaver, 2006), which may lead them to over-trust the perspectives offered by interactive systems for reflection and consequently doubt their own feelings (Zhu et al., 2025). Additionally, excessive reflection can lead to rumination, trapping users in negative emotional cycles (Eikey et al., 2021; Loerakker et al., 2024). The negative consequences of these reflective technologies discussed above stem from underlying design assumptions that tend to prioritize individualistic, self-awareness and goal-oriented approaches (Rapp and Tirassa, 2017; Murnane et al., 2018; Aseniero et al., 2020), viewing reflection as a retrospective review of data or as problem-solving aimed at achieving predefined goals. These approaches neglect sociality, sensitivity to external contexts, and the entanglement of data and user (Lupton, 2017; Sanches et al., 2022; Zhu et al., 2025; Homewood et al., 2020), rarely exploring more spontaneous, emergent, and embodied forms of reflection that characterize everyday life (Bhattacharjee et al., 2023; Rapp and Boldi, 2023; Núñez-Pacheco et al., 2025; Jiang and Ahmadpour, 2022). Fundamentally, reflection in HCI remains shaped largely by Western epistemologies that emphasize analytical, critical, and reasoning modes (Ixer, 1999; Edwards and Nicoll, 2006; Sengers et al., 2005; Ibrahim et al., 2024; Baumer, 2015; Akama, 2012), typically positioning the mind as the primary site for knowledge and reflection. These models situate reflection within dualistic assumptions of subject–object separation and mind–body dualism (Kant, 2000; Dewey, 1997), leaving little room for alternative epistemologies or ontologies, which has resulted in the severe underrepresentation of non-Western historical, cultural, and philosophical traditions in reflection research (Tan, 2020b; Sengers et al., 2005) and their consequent marginalization (Akama et al., 2020). Although slow technology (Hallnäs and Redström, 2001) and soma design (Hook, 2018) challenge dominant design practices by foregrounding ambiguity, slowness, and embodied experiences, they remain influenced by the epistemological assumptions identified above. Slow technology still frames reflection as a deliberate, mind-centered activity, while soma design, despite challenging mind–body dualism, remains rooted in an individualistic phenomenological stance. In other words, these approaches extend or complicate dominant models of reflection but do not fully challenge the ego- or self-centered cognitive epistemology that positions the reflective self as a bounded, intentional, mind-centered agent. This epistemic boundary clarifies why alternative philosophical traditions are necessary for understanding what reflection means and how technologies might support it. While Buddhist-inspired practices, such as mindfulness and contemplation, have entered the field and been shown to support reflection (Terzimehić et al., 2019; Mah et al., 2021), these remain largely confined to professional settings (Li et al., 2024). In light of the epistemological challenges and ethical complexities increasingly faced by the HCI research agenda (Frauenberger, 2019), broadening alternative epistemological perspectives to appreciate the scope of reflection in HCI has become imperative. Reflection as an epistemological commitment (Baumer, 2015) calls for rethinking how technologies can support it in ways that move beyond existing models. Rather than seeking a “best” approach or attempting to synthesize diverse traditions into a unified model, we argue for respecting each knowledge system’s cosmological locality while allowing them to coexist, resonate, and occasionally challenge one another. In this study we extend this agenda by proposing Daoism as a theoretical lens to reconceptualize reflection in HCI and inspire alternative approaches to designing technology for reflection. ## 3. Background: Daoism Daoist thought, originating in China, centers on the Dao (道, path, way) as the guiding principle of existence (Hansen, 2025). Classical texts such as the Dao De Jing (Laozi) and the Zhuangzi emphasize alignment with natural rhythms through concepts like Zi-Ran (自然, self-soing), Wu-Wei (無為, effortless action), and Yin-Yang (陰陽, dynamic complementarity) (Feng, 1983; Liu, 2014; Serrán-Pagán y Fuentes, 2013; Fang, 2012). Together, these ideas stress the value of fluidity over rigidity, relational balance over hierarchy, and responsiveness over control. Rather than prescribing fixed rules, Daoism points to an ongoing process of attunement between humans, society, and the natural world. These overarching themes foreground adaptability, interdependence, and transformation, offering generative perspectives for rethinking reflection in HCI. While Western scholarship has often separated Daoism into “philosophical” (daojia) and “religious” (daojiao) strands, recent studies emphasize their inseparability, highlighting the unity of Daoist thought and practice (Tan and Bao, 2024; Kirkland, 1997). Our work focuses on the philosophical thoughts related to the concept of reflection embodied in the Laozi and Zhuangzi texts, which are considered the most representative of Daoism (Liu, 2014). At the same time, we do not strictly exclude their religious or spiritual dimensions, recognizing spirituality as a form of holistic living that can support meaning-making and reflective practice in everyday life (Fook, 2016; Botelho, 2021; Markum et al., 2024). In the following, we survey Daoism’s influence in contemporary disciplines, introduce its key concepts, and examine how reflection has been understood within this tradition. Our aim is not to provide a doctrinal account of Daoism, but to draw on its central ideas as resources for developing an alternative framework of reflection in HCI, complementing Western perspectives while sensitively introducing non-Western ways of knowing (Hui, 2019; Akama, 2012). ### 3.1. Contemporary Application of Daoism Daoism, as a non-Western intellectual orientation that challenges dominant paradigms, has offered profound insights across diverse disciplinary fields, including wellness (Wang, 2022; Yip, 2004; Kohn, 2005; Ding et al., 2020), education (Hung and Yeh, 2013; Tan, 2020a), and design (Jiang et al., 2023b, a; Jiang and Hayama, 2026). For instance, Jiang and colleagues developed a design tool grounded in Daoist Five Elements to advance more-than-human design approaches move beyond Western-centric discourses. (Jiang et al., 2023a); while Hung and Yeh explored how Daoist cultural values could reshape the aesthetics of curriculum in contemporary education (Hung and Yeh, 2013). In HCI, prior studies have explored the design of interactive digital experiences inspired by Daoist meditation techniques and Taichi (Henchoz et al., 2021; Gao et al., 2022), Mah et al.’s work integrates Daoist concepts of Wu-Wei and Yin-Yang to reimagine future design agendas for rest in HCI, emphasizing the entanglement between human rest and nonhuman temporalities (Mah et al., 2025). However, Daoism remains underexplored as a theoretical or epistemological lens in HCI, where it could offer alternative perspectives for technology design. ### 3.2. Core Concepts: Dao, Zi-Ran, Wu-Wei and Yin-Yang Table 1. Daoist Key Concepts and Connections with Reflection | Dao | The origin of the myriad phenomena (Feng, 1983). | Reflection is grounded in embodied alignment with one’s environment rather than abstract reasoning. | | --- | --- | --- | | Zi-ran | “Self-soing” or spontaneity (Liu, 2016). | Emphasizes relational existence within reflection. | | Wu-Wei | Effortless or non-purposive action (Slingerland, 2007). | Reflection is not deliberate problem-solving or rational evaluation, but cultivating attunement to circumstances and acting with minimal resistance. | | Yin–Yang | Interdependence and dynamic complementarity (Fang, 2012). | Reflection resists fixed conclusions and embraces change and productive tension. | #### 3.2.1. Dao As the central concept in Daoism, Dao is endowed with metaphysical meaning (Feng, 1983). Scholars have offered diverse interpretations, describing it as “the origin of the myriad phenomena” (Shih, 1919). However, many explanations rely on Western philosophy, which fails to fully capture its complex meanings (Liu, 2014). As expressed at the very beginning of the Dao De Jing, Dao is of an ineffable nature: The way that can be spoken of, Is not the constant way; (Laozi and Lau, 2003, Dao De Jing Verse 01) Building on this ineffability, Dao conveys a dynamic system of mutual arising between yin and yang, realized through the unity of the embodied self and its environment (see Fig. 1 for details of the character’s composition). Dao emphasizes lived experiences, bodily awareness, and attunement to the rhythms of the world, suggesting that reflection lies in alignment with one’s environment rather than in abstract reasoning (Krausová et al., 2013; Merleau-Ponty, 1945). <details> <summary>Fig02.png Details</summary>  ### Visual Description ## Diagram: Daoist Concept of "Dao" (道) ### Overview The image depicts a stylized Chinese character "道" (Dao), representing the Daoist concept of "the Way." The character is annotated with three labeled components (①, ②, ③) and a dotted line indicating "Complementarity." Colors (blue, red, orange, black) differentiate elements, with textual labels in English and Chinese. ### Components/Axes 1. **Character Structure**: - The character "道" is composed of three distinct segments: - **① Yin Yang**: A blue and red yin-yang symbol at the top, split vertically. - **② Self**: An orange vertical stroke on the right side. - **③ The path of walking**: A black horizontal stroke at the bottom. - A dotted line labeled "Complementarity" connects the blue and red yin-yang segments. 2. **Annotations**: - **① Yin Yang**: Blue (yin) and red (yang) halves, labeled in English and Chinese (阴阳). - **② Self**: Orange stroke labeled "Self" (自我 in Chinese). - **③ The path of walking**: Black stroke labeled "The path of walking" (走路之道 in Chinese). 3. **Spatial Grounding**: - **① Yin Yang**: Top-center of the character. - **② Self**: Right-middle of the character. - **③ The path of walking**: Bottom-left of the character. - **Complementarity**: Dotted line spans the top horizontal axis of the character. ### Detailed Analysis - **Color Coding**: - Blue (yin) and red (yang) represent dualistic opposites. - Orange (self) and black (path) symbolize individual agency and action. - **Textual Labels**: - All annotations are in English, with direct Chinese translations provided. - No numerical data or scales are present. ### Key Observations 1. The yin-yang symbol (①) is split vertically, emphasizing balance between opposing forces. 2. The "Self" (②) is positioned as a vertical counterpoint to the horizontal "path of walking" (③), suggesting integration of inner and outer journeys. 3. "Complementarity" (dotted line) implies dynamic interaction between yin and yang, not static opposition. ### Interpretation This diagram illustrates the Daoist principle that the Dao (道) arises from the interplay of complementary forces (yin-yang), individual self-cultivation (self), and embodied action (path of walking). The vertical-horizontal alignment of components reflects the Daoist emphasis on harmony between heaven (yin) and earth (yang), while the character’s structure itself embodies the idea that the Dao is both a metaphysical principle and a practical guide for living. The absence of numerical data reinforces its philosophical rather than empirical nature. </details> Figure 1. Building on this, turning to the composition of the Chinese character Dao (道) can better reveal meanings that go beyond philosophical abstractions. Dao (道) consists of two parts. The first part (首) means “head”, and can also be understood as “person”. If further broken down ( 八 一自), the two dots on the top may be seen as (1) the interdependence of yin and yang, while the horizontal stroke between them represents their integration, manifesting complementarity rather than opposition. (2) The other component is 自, meaning “self”, which, within the Chinese cosmological view, emphasizes embodiment rather than pure consciousness as in Western philosophy. (3) The other part (辶) signifies “to walk”, or as a noun, “the path of walking” (Krausová et al., 2013). This cosmological principle is not only metaphysical but also embodied, taking form as the material vitality known as Qi (氣). In Daoist thought, Qi is both breath and vital energy, often described as the force that animates the human body and circulates through nature (Graham, 1989; Ye, 1985). If Dao represents the underlying order of the world, then Qi is its manifestation in lived experience, sustaining life and connecting all beings (Liu, 2008). #### 3.2.2. Zi-Ran Zi-Ran, is often translated as naturalness, yet it differs greatly from the modern concept of nature. The character Zi (自) means “self” and Ran (然) means “so”, so literally it conveys meanings such as “self-soing”, “self-going”, “being free”, or ”spontaneous” (Liu, 2016), suggesting the spontaneous existence and development of things without artificial interruption or arbitrary control (Liu, 2014; Cheng, 1986), both the Dao De Jing and Zhuangzi use metaphor of the infant to express the state of Zi-Ran (Laozi and Lau, 2003, Verse 10) (Watson, 2013, Miscellaneous Chapter 23). Importantly, the “self” in Zi is not equivalent to Western notions of individualism. Instead, it transcends a purely human “state of nature” and carries deeper ontological significance. As described in the Dao De Jing: Man models himself on earth, Earth on heaven, Heaven on the way, And the way on that which is naturally so. (Laozi and Lau, 2003, Dao De Jing Verse 25) This verse shows that Zi-Ran is not merely an attribute of nature or individual freedom, but a principle that permeates humans, earth, heaven, and Dao. Rather than positioning the self as autonomous or oppositional, Zi-Ran emphasizes relational existence, where spontaneity arises through attunement to the larger order of things. #### 3.2.3. Wu-Wei The way never acts yet nothing is left undone. Should lords and princes be able to hold fast to it, The myriad creatures will be transformed of their own accord. (Laozi and Lau, 2003, Dao De Jing Verse37) As Laozi describes in the above text, the non-action of the Dao allows all things to transform of their own accord, revealing Wu-Wei as a practical method for attaining the state of Zi-Ran (Liu, 2014). Wu-Wei is often translated as “non-action”, yet its true meaning extends far beyond the literal sense. Slingerland refers to it as “effortless action” and “non-purposive action” (Slingerland, 2007), while other interpretations include “never over-doing”, “no conscious effort”, “no set purpose”, and ”non-dual action” (Zhu, 2002). Liu identifies three characteristics of Wu-Wei: (1) when things run well, do not interfere; (2) when action is necessary, act without selfish desire;, and (3) always align with the Dao, refraining from imposing artificial control (Liu, 2006). These traits demonstrate the fluidity and adaptability of non-interfering action (Liu, 1996), while also carrying an ethical dimension: the spontaneity of one’s actions should not obstruct the natural flow of others. Moral subjectivity in Wu-Wei arise not from prescriptive rules but through the dissolution of the self into a state of emptiness and openness (Stokes, 2016; Berkson, 2005; De Prycker, 2011). The emptiness is not a loss of control, but a release from the demand for a unified, consistent self, embedding the individual in the immediacy of the ever-changing present. In this way, Wu-Wei embodies pre-reflective, non-deliberative, and spontaneous (Banner, 2018). For instance, in martial arts or Tai Chi, movements are not consciously selected but emerge fluidly in response to the opponent from a place of tranquil observation (Knightly, 2013). Such an orientation reframes reflection not as deliberate problem solving or rational evaluation, but as cultivating attunement to circumstances and acting with minimal resistance. #### 3.2.4. Yin-Yang Yin-Yang refers to the complementary forces that structure Daoist cosmology (Fang, 2012). Rather than fixed opposites, Yin and Yang are interdependent and mutually transforming: heaven, earth, and humanity arise from the continuous interaction (Laozi and Lau, 2003, Verse 42) (Zhang, 2008). This dynamic reveals that any state already contains the seed of its opposite (Nisbett, 2010). Laozi described: Turning back is how the way moves; Weakness is the means the way employs. (Laozi and Lau, 2003, Dao De Jing Verse 40) Here, reversal is not collapse but renewal, and weakness is not absence but generative potential. Such an orientation questions whether reflection is about reaching fixed conclusions, instead framing it as embracing change and tension. ## 4. Methods To complement our conceptual understanding of Daoism from existing literature, we conducted semi-structured interviews with experts (e.g., practitioners, priests, and scholars) who actively engage with Daoism both theoretically and in practice, recent HCI research has similarly engaged philosophers (Wakkary et al., 2022) as well as religious experts and practitioners (Claisse and Durrant, 2023; Kozubaev and Howell, 2024) through interviews and dialogical inquiry to reveal how philosophical interpretation and spiritual practice can meaningfully inform design and technology. These interviews took place between March and July 2025. Given that foundational Daoist texts such as the Dao De Jing and Zhuangzi are written in Classical Chinese and are subject to diverse and contested interpretations (Liu, 2014), we sought to draw upon the living knowledge of experts who work closely with these texts in contemporary contexts. Through these interviews, we aimed to understand how Daoist ideas are interpreted, embodied, and applied in both personal and professional spheres, in order to address our research question. This interpretive approach enabled us to attend not only to established meanings but also to how Daoist philosophies are situated and enacted in lived experience. This research was approved by our institutional review board. Table 2. Demographics of the participants | P01 | M | 40 | Asian (Singaporean) | Singapore | Priest | 22 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | P02 | M | 25 | Asian (Singaporean) | Singapore | Priest | 6 | | P03 | M | 26 | Asian (Chinese) | Australia | Scholar | 9 | | P04 | M | 31 | Asian (Singaporean) | Singapore | Priest | 10 | | P05 | M | 36 | Asian (Singaporean) | Singapore | Priest | 20 | | P06 | M | 38 | Asian (Singaporean) | Singapore | Priest | 10 | | P07 | F | 29 | Asian (Chinese) | Australia | Scholar | 3 | | P08 | M | 65 | White (Italian) | Italy | Priest | 45 | | P09 | M | 30 | Asian (Indonesian) | Indonesia | Priest | 13 | | P10 | M | 39 | Asian (Indonesian) | Indonesia | Practitioner | 10 | | P11 | F | 42 | White (Dutch) | Singapore | Priest | 13 | | P12 | M | 63 | Asian (Singaporean) | Singapore | Priest | 30 | | P13 | M | 71 | Asian (Singaporean) | Singapore | Priest | 30+ | | P14 | M | 50 | Asian (Singaporean) | Singapore | Priest | 10+ | | P15 | M | – | White (Russian) | Australia | Practitioner | 10+ | | P16 | F | 40 | Asian (Chinese) | Singapore | Scholar | 13 | | P17 | M | 22 | Asian (Singaporean) | Singapore | Scholar/Practitioner | 2 | | P18 | F | 35 | White (American) | Singapore | Scholar | 13+ | Note: M = Male; F = Female; – = Unknown. ### 4.1. Researcher Positionality Given the cultural and theoretical sensitivity of our work, it is necessary for us to reflect on our positionality. The research team is entirely originally from Asia. The first author as a native Mandarin speaker from China, holds a linguistic and cultural understanding in engaging with Daoist classical texts written in classical Chinese and the philosophical traditions deeply embedded in Chinese culture. His understanding is enriched by situated practice and immersion within Daoist temples in China about half a year. In addition, his broader research examines how nonhuman agencies participate in shaping relationality within marginalized communities through participatory design; this attentiveness to human–nonhuman interdependence further deepens his engagement with Daoist ontological commitments. The second author was born in South East Asia to parents of South East Asian descent. Her family migrated to Australia when she was a child and she completed her education there. The second author’s research background is at the intersection of soma and movement-based research in HCI and culturally informed and embodied epistemologies, inspired by Buddhist and Daoist philosophy. She has been martial arts practitioner of over thirty years, and is a student of both external martial arts, such as karate, and internal Chinese arts, such as Taijiquan, Qigong and Neigong. The last author is originally from East Asia and later lived and received academic training in a Western country, where he developed his grounding in HCI and design research. Although he is not a Daoist practitioner and does not speak Mandarin, he learned classical Chinese characters through public education, and Daoist ideas were part of the broader cultural environment in which he grew up. Through this everyday exposure, he became familiar with philosophical orientations—such as viewing forces in the world as relational and counterbalancing, and understanding personal, social, and environmental realms as interconnected. While these ideas were not part of a formal religious practice, they shaped his intuitive approach to Daoism as a lived philosophy rather than a doctrinal system. His scholarly work is situated in interpretive and critical HCI, particularly reflective design and technologies that support reflective practices. Through this work, he has become aware of limitations in dominant Western approaches to reflection, which motivated the exploration of Daoism as an alternative philosophical framework. Therefore, in light of the above research positions, we seek to bridge Daoist philosophy and reflection in HCI with reflexivity, embodiment and epistemic humility (Wakkary, 2020). ### 4.2. Participants & Recruitment We interviewed 18 experts with diverse forms of engagement with Daoist traditions, including priests, scholars, and practitioners (see Table 2 for participant details). When recruiting participants, we focused on their Daoist identities because these backgrounds shape how individuals understand and engage with Daoist traditions in different ways. Scholars, through systematic study of Daoist classics and philosophical texts, approached Daoism at a conceptual and theoretical level. Practitioners tended to understand Daoism through bodily cultivation, engaging in reflection and realizing the Dao through embodied perception. Priests were able to share both philosophical insights and embodied practices, as well as perspectives related to religious rituals (although this paper does not focus on the ritual dimension). Our definition of “expert” was intentionally broad, encompassing individuals with deep experiential or intellectual knowledge of Daoism, gained through academic study, spiritual practice, or applied philosophy. We define Daoist scholars as individuals who have published academic or public-facing work on Daoism or who are affiliated with institutions where they research or teach Daoist philosophy or practice. This group included faculty members and PhD students engaged in relevant research. While no minimum years of experience were required, we prioritized those with sustained engagement through publications, teaching, or formal research. We define Daoist practitioners and priests as individuals who self-identify as practicing Daoists and have engaged in personal or community-based practices, such as rituals, meditation, or involvement with Daoist temples and communities (either online or offline). Participants were eligible if they were 21 years or older and fluent in either English or Mandarin. Recruitment was conducted through a combination of purposive and snowball sampling. We identified potential participants by reviewing publicly available information, including academic websites, publications, social media, and online communities where Daoism is discussed or practiced (e.g., Reddit, Telegram group, TikTok). We also contacted local non-governmental organizations related to Daoism and directly reached out to individuals using publicly listed contact details. Snowball sampling was used to extend our outreach to additional eligible participants. Although the study was initiated in Singapore, we did not restrict recruitment geographically, as several participants were based internationally and identified through global networks and online platforms. Because our goal was to understand Daoist perspectives on reflection rather than to compare practices and understandings across national or ethnic groups, we did not treat participants’ country of residence or ethnicity as analytical categories. Daoism circulates transnationally and is practiced in diverse cultural contexts, and for this first HCI study engaging Daoist philosophy, we sought to capture a broad range of engagements rather than limit participation to individuals living in specific East Asian cultural environments. ### 4.3. Data Collection: Interviews <details> <summary>Fig03.png Details</summary>  ### Visual Description ## Photographic Panels: Cultural and Social Contexts ### Overview The image comprises three labeled panels (A, B, C) depicting distinct cultural and social environments. Panel A shows a group meeting, Panel B displays an empty room with ritualistic elements, and Panel C features a decorated ceremonial space. No numerical data, charts, or explicit textual content (beyond labels) is visible. ### Components/Axes - **Panel A**: - **Setting**: Indoor room with white walls, framed pictures, and a window with black curtains. - **Subjects**: 8 individuals seated at tables, blurred faces. - **Objects**: Red trash bin, wooden table, decorative items on shelves. - **Lighting**: Overhead fluorescent lights. - **Panel B**: - **Setting**: Open room with wooden flooring, large window with black curtains, and a view of a pink building outside. - **Objects**: Folded chairs, red stools, laptop on a table, and a red carpet. - **Decor**: Posters on walls, no visible text. - **Panel C**: - **Setting**: Ornate ceremonial space with red lanterns, statues, and traditional Chinese motifs. - **Objects**: Statues of deities, red and gold decorations, Chinese characters on walls. - **Lighting**: Bright, with red lanterns as focal points. ### Detailed Analysis - **Panel A**: No discernible text or numerical data. The scene suggests a formal or semi-formal gathering, possibly a workshop or community meeting. - **Panel B**: No text or data visible. The room appears prepared for an event, with ritualistic elements (e.g., red stools, laptop). - **Panel C**: Chinese characters and symbols (e.g., "福" for luck) are present but not legible. The space resembles a temple or cultural center. ### Key Observations - **Absence of Data**: No charts, graphs, or numerical information is present in any panel. - **Cultural Context**: Panels B and C emphasize traditional Chinese aesthetics (e.g., lanterns, statues, red/gold color scheme). - **Panel A**: Focus on human interaction, with blurred faces suggesting anonymity or privacy. ### Interpretation The panels collectively highlight cultural practices and social dynamics. Panel C’s ceremonial decor suggests a focus on tradition, while Panel A’s meeting setup implies collaboration. Panel B’s empty room may symbolize preparation or transition. The absence of explicit data points limits quantitative analysis, but the visual elements convey themes of community, ritual, and cultural preservation. ## Notes - **Language**: Chinese characters appear in Panel C but are not transcribed due to illegibility. - **Uncertainty**: No numerical values or explicit textual content can be extracted. - **Spatial Grounding**: Labels (A, B, C) are positioned in the bottom-left corner of each panel. </details> Figure 2. Our in person interview settings: (A) Practitioners at the Daoist Association were engaged in a collective scripture study session. We observed their chanting practice and conducted an interview with the priest (P02) leading the recitation after it concluded, this collective chanting practice prompted us to further understand the dao as something situated within relationality. (B) The interview setting for another Daoist priest (P01) at the Daoist Association. (C) A Daoist temple in Singapore, where we interviewed three participants (P12-14). We conducted interviews either in person (see Fig. 2) or via Zoom, depending on each participant’s preference and availability. Each interview lasted approximately 60 to 90 minutes. All interviews followed a semi-structured format guided by a flexible set of prompts, allowing participants to share their experiences in ways most relevant to their personal and professional engagements with Daoist philosophy. While we explored a common set of themes (e.g., participants’ backgrounds, everyday engagement with Daoist principles, everyday reflective practices, ways of sharing these teachings with others, and perspectives on contemporary technologies During the interviews, we did not use the specific term “contemporary technologies”. Instead, we inquired more broadly about their perspectives on using technology in daily life from a Daoist viewpoint and followed up on their responses. Specific categories of technology, such as artificial intelligence, wearable devices, and tracking tools, emerged naturally during these conversations.), the flow and emphasis of each conversation varied depending on the participant’s expertise and lived experience. Interviews were conducted primarily in English. However, some participants felt more comfortable discussing Daoist concepts in Mandarin. In such cases, we allowed participants to move fluidly between English and Mandarin during the conversation, depending on what felt most natural for expressing Daoist concepts. At least one member of the research team was fluent in both English and Mandarin, and either one or two team members were present during each interview to ensure accurate communication and effective engagement. While the concept of reflection was central to our inquiry, we did not impose a rigid or predetermined definition during the interviews. Instead, building on our working definition, we allowed the notion to emerge organically through conversation, following up with open-ended questions to better understand participants’ interpretations. This approach reflects our effort to avoid framing reflection solely through dominant Western perspectives, instead foregrounding participants’ own vocabularies and worldviews. Accordingly, rather than directly asking about specific Daoist principles, we let related ideas surface naturally; when they did not, we introduced gentle prompts to sustain discussion while remaining attentive to participants’ ways of knowing. With participants’ consent, all interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed for analysis. Each participant received a S$10 (or equivalent) gift card as a token of appreciation. In-person interviews occasionally coincided with community gatherings or ritual ceremonies, offering additional opportunities to observe how Daoist values were enacted in practice. During these encounters, we took field notes and photographs to supplement the interview data and capture insights into the situated and embodied nature of Daoist engagement. ### 4.4. Data Analysis We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke, 2006) to identify patterns of meaning across the interview data. All interviews were transcribed and, when necessary, translated into English. For transcripts containing mixed Mandarin and English, more than two members of the research team, fluent in Mandarin and English, reviewed the translations to ensure cultural and linguistic accuracy. The initial coding was led by two authors who independently conducted open coding on different subsets of transcripts in ATLAS.ti. Through analytic memoing and regular discussions, the coding process was informed by both inductive insights and sensitizing concepts from relevant literature. The first and third authors then collaboratively reviewed and organized the initial codes into higher-level conceptual groupings. These groupings were iteratively refined through discussion across the team, resulting in the construction of interpretive themes that captured recurring patterns, such as forgetting and listening. We specifically focused on the different types of practices participants described for elaborating the notion of reflection and their everyday reflective practices, and aligned these with Daoist concepts. ## 5. Findings: Dimensions of Reflection in Daoism Table 3. Daoist Reflection Components, Methods, Descriptions and Relationship with Existing Framework in HCI | Stillness | Stillness grounds reflection as a pre-cognitive, embodied openness that loosens the self and creates space for meaning to appear. | Forgetting: a reflective practice of releasing attachment to social roles and dualistic distinctions | Existing HCI frames reflection as deliberate reasoning (Fleck and Fitzpatrick, 2010), whereas stillness sees it as openness—less constructing the self, more loosening it. | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Silence: an active reflective method that suspends linguistic expression and habitual judgment | | | | | Resonance | Resonance refers to meaning emerging through inward attentiveness that fosters self-acceptance, together with open and critical awareness of situations. | Listening: a reflective practice of attending to inner presence, enabling awareness and acceptance of one’s present state. | Extending reflection beyond purely cognitive and retrospective models (Fleck and Fitzpatrick, 2010; Loerakker et al., 2024) to embodied sensing and experience, with a focus on present-moment experience. | | Observation: a reflective practice of maintaining non-judgmental awareness of external situations, balanced with critical vigilance. | | | | | Emergence | Emergence refers to a dynamic attunement aligning through body, situation and nature rhythms, generating new understanding through adaptation and acceptance of uncertainty. | Attunement: an active reflective process of being in tune with bodily rhythms, situational flows, and natural cycles. | Emphasizing adaptation and generation rather than control or optimization, while revealing existential and relational dimensions absent in existing reflection frameworks (Fleck and Fitzpatrick, 2010). | | Becoming: a reflective practice of perceiving otherness and relationality. | | | | We identified three interrelated dimensions of Daoist reflection (see Table 3): Stillness, Resonance, and Emergence. Each dimension expands reflection beyond dominant HCI framings of cognition, individual introspection, problem-solving, and self-improvement, instead emphasizing emptiness, relationality, and emergence. Importantly, these three dimensions are all forms of reflection, understood as distinct processes of meaning-making. Each represents a different way of making meaning, without implying a linear progression. From the perspective of Dao, where the aim is to live with the Dao and cultivate harmony with it, the three dimensions may be interpreted as intertwined stages. These stages are not strictly linear but unfold as part of a trajectory: beginning with Stillness, moving toward Listening and Observation (Resonance), and culminating in Emergence. ### 5.1. Stillness Stillness is a grounding mode of reflection in which meaning emerges through quieting, emptying, and loosening one’s grip on fixed identities and roles (i.e., forgetting). Rather than discursive problem-solving, Stillness cultivates a receptive awareness that enables reflective practices. Participants described Stillness as a proactive, embodied practice rather than passive withdrawal. Through meditation, Qigong, Shouyi, or undivided attention to a single everyday activity, they sought to quiet fluctuations and return awareness to the present. As P06 explained, “your attention is fully on this single action. It is natural. Over time, scattered thoughts calm down. We reduce the burden of our senses and the burden of our mind” (P06). Several participants framed this as forgetting social roles and dualistic distinctions so that a fresh perspective can arise. P02 described: “Maybe our heart suffers because it enters into duality. It is either in the future or the past. We try to bring it back. Now you are not your name or your role. Who are you?” (P02). For them, Stillness sustained attention, stabilized emotion, and clarified judgment without reinforcing a bounded self. Participants further described silence as an active method that opens reflective space. P03 noted, “Sometimes silence is even more powerful than language. It is a common expression in our intuitive life” (P03). This resonates with the Daodejing on wordless teaching: “the sage… practices the teaching that uses no words” (Laozi and Lau, 2003, Dao De Jing Verse 2). Silence suspended habitual, dualistic evaluation and enabled an integrated perception of situations. Whereas existing HCI frameworks often equate reflection with deliberate reasoning (Fleck and Fitzpatrick, 2010), Stillness reframes reflection as a state of emptiness and openness rather than introspection. Deliberate reasoning, in this view, does not deepen reflection but fills the mind with too much thinking, leaving little room for receptive awareness. From this perspective, participants also framed digital technologies as sources of “noise” that disrupt reflective space. P01 described mobile technology as a form of “noise”, sharing: “For me, the phone is more of a distraction—too many nonsense calls all day. So it depends on how people use it. If used properly, it’s good. But if you’re just scrolling through TikTok, it’ll affect you—seeing meaningless things affects your judgment, and your emotions will be different…” (P01). Rather than supporting openness, such stimulation produces the same restlessness and mental noise that Stillness seeks to quiet. This aligns with longstanding Daoist critiques that technologies can disrupt the natural balance of life. Zhuangzi captures this in his account of the mechanical heart, The term mechanical heart corresponds to the Daoist concept of jixin (機心), which refers to a mode of reasoning demanded by machines—one that diverts the Dao from its pure form and thereby generates anxiety. In the Zhuangzi, this notion is introduced as follows: “ Where there are machines, there are bound to be machine worries; where there are machine worries, there are bound to be machine hearts. With a machine heart in your breast, you spoil what is pure and simple; and without the pure and simple, nothing can be truly settled ”. a mind overfilled with stimuli rather than emptied for reflection. This critique highlights the deep philosophical stakes of Stillness. Daoist texts frame Stillness as cosmologically significant: a return to simplicity and alignment with the Dao ’s generative void. There is a thing confusedly formed, Born before heaven and earth. Silent and void It stands alone and does not change, Goes round and does not weary. (Laozi and Lau, 2003, Dao De Jing Verse 25) In this light, Stillness is not merely a psychological technique but a way of being situated in the Dao ’s flow. Classical metaphor such as the infant or the uncarved block illustrate this return to naturalness (Laozi and Lau, 2003, Dao De Jing Verses 15, 28). Participant’s accounts echoed these sensibilities: reflection began not with discursive review but with cultivated awareness that dissolves ego-bound identities. This form of awareness can resemble early stages of reflection (R0 and R1 (Fleck and Fitzpatrick, 2010)), yet what participants described was not a substantial self. As P02 summarized, “this awareness is not you; it is just there, observing” (P02). Thus, Stillness reframes reflection as more than self-examination. It is a mode of self-loosening that opens onto the Dao’s generative grounds, producing responsiveness and relational awareness. ### 5.2. Resonance Resonance is a mode of reflection in which meaning arises through sensitivity to inner states and noticing external situations and others. It frames meaning-making as relational rather than solitary, widening reflection beyond an individual’s cognitive appraisal. We use the term Resonance, drawing on Gan-Ying (感應, “sympathetic response”) in Chinese cosmology (Hui, 2019). Gan-ying describes how things in the cosmos are mutually responsive, resonating with one another’s actions and phenomena. Our findings highlight resonance as a process of meaning-making that unfolds through multidimensional sensory experiences extending beyond the self—particularly through Listening (to inner states) and Observation (of external situations). #### 5.2.1. Listening Listening foregrounds the individual’s attention to inner presence, enabling individuals to understand their natural state and to accept any self-state in the present moment. The concept of listening extends beyond sensory hearing or evaluative judgement (Turner, 2022). Zhuangzi describes this shift from ear to heart to qi: Unify your attention. Rather than listen with the ear, listen with the heart. Rather than listen with the heart, listen with the energies. (Watson, 2013, Inner Chapter 04) Participants echoed this view by describing attentiveness to breath and bodily sensations. P01 described: “There is the concept of listening, what I call ‘listening to the breath’. It means not listening to external sounds, but to the voice within oneself.” (P01). Such Listening returned the self to spontaneity and Zi-Ran (naturalness) (Matthyssen, 2025), resonating with Laozi’s image of the supple infant (Laozi and Lau, 2003, Dao De Jing, Verse 10). This orientation also illuminated participants’ critiques of digital self-tracking. As P17 emphasized, representational data can pull attention away from one’s natural state. From her perspective, Daoism seeks technologies that support an authentic sense of self-soing and alignment with the present situation, rather than ones that estrange individuals from it: “let’s say, screen time and all that, I guess the Daoism would question the, I mean, definitely it can help to a certain extent, but I think the Daoism would think, oh, maybe by having all these screen times and all that, it’s already fixating on the number rather than the actual person itself, aligning with the situation at hand.” (P17). In this sense, listening to inner presence contrasted with the distraction of numerical representations, emphasizing resonance to lived experience over fixation on externalized metrics. In this state of Zi-Ran, listening was also framed as a dialogue with vulnerability. P15 explained: “A certain aspect of the balancing of the psyche occurs simply because of the application of attention to themselves… Within the acceptance, a degree of comfort starts to arise.” (P15). In this sense, listening enables the practitioner to dialogue with their vulnerability, and through embracing such vulnerability, the individual generates new transformations of the present state of self, being able to “Be at peace with self” (P02). Listening therefore reframes reflection not as deliberate reasoning or cognitive self-assessment, but as an embodied openness that normalizes vulnerability. #### 5.2.2. Observation Observation refers to a suspended, non-judgmental awareness of external situations, balanced with critical vigilance. Zhuangzi illustrates this through the metaphor of the mirror: “The Perfect Man uses his mind like a mirror—going after nothing, welcoming nothing, responding but not storing” (Watson, 2013, Inner Chapter 6). The mirror suggests a mode of perception that reflects circumstances as they are, without clinging to them or carrying forward residues from past encounters. Whereas Listening turned inward (e.g., attuning to breath, inner states, and vulnerability), Observation directed this mirror-like openness outward, toward the surrounding world. Participants described this as maintaining a wider perspective while holding some distance. P06 shared: “I would observe the whole picture of things in a deeper and clearer way. When I am able to see the whole picture, I would decide how to react or how to act…” (P06). At the same time, Observation was not passive acceptance. It required discernment and vigilance. P07 reflected: “We all have to be vigilant, rather than a kind of blind obedience. What he (Zhuangzi) has been emphasizing… is that he values our ability to make judgments and questions.” (P07). Thus, observation balanced open reflection, like the mirror’s capacity to reflect without storing, with critical questioning that resists blind conformity, while enabling spontaneous responsiveness. In this way, Observation reframes reflection not as detached monitoring but as outward attentiveness that resists blind conformity. Together, Listening and Observation show how reflection emerges through resonance: inward attentiveness and outward vigilance. Resonance extends reflection beyond individual introspection by grounding it in embodied sensing (Qi) and critical openness to circumstances. In contrast to HCI’s emphasis on retrospective analysis (Fleck and Fitzpatrick, 2010; Loerakker et al., 2024), resonance emphasizes present-moment awareness as the basis of reflection. This orientation aligns with Daoist critiques of rational, instrumental knowledge (Zhi, 知) (Lynn, 2022; Wang, 2025; Tang, 2016), and affirms intuitive knowing Here we translate it as intuitive knowing, though no single English word fully convey its meaning. The character 明 combines the sun (日) and moon (月), connoting brightness, illumination, and clarity. It is often associated with insight, discernment, or luminous awareness, with an emphasis on embodied and situational knowing. (Ming, 明). P17 echoed this: “Zhuangzi and Laozi… they criticise Zhi, and they say that Ming is where the reality is… a lot of thoughts will come into my brain and my mind and whatever. I just try to let them be. I try not to label them.” (P17). Thus, resonance positions reflection not as inferential reasoning (Moon, 2013; Baumer, 2015), but as embodied awareness that precedes labeling and analysis, enabling intuitive acceptance of the present moment. In this way, reflection arises through embodied and relational awareness, extending HCI’s focus on cognitive or retrospective models toward present-moment experience. ### 5.3. Emergence Following Stillness and Resonance, we conceptualize Emergence as a broader mode of reflection that encompasses both Attunement and Becoming. Stillness grounds reflection in quiet receptivity, Resonance widens it through sensory sensitivity, and Emergence highlights how reflection unfolds as an ongoing process of embodied alignment and relational transformation. In this sense, reflection arises not as a solitary cognitive act but as an alignment with bodily rhythms, situational flows, and natural cycles, while also dissolving ego-boundaries into interdependent relations with others and the Dao. #### 5.3.1. Attunement Attunement refers to a mode of reflection in which meaning emerges through alignment. Participants reflected not only on their inner states but also on their relations with situations and environments, where meaning is created through sensitivity to bodily rhythms, situational flows, and natural cycles. Whereas Resonance described the discovery of meaning in the present moment, Attunement highlighted the gradual working with and rebalancing of those meanings over time. Participants described aligning body and mind by shifting attention from abstract cognition toward embodied rhythms. P11 explained: “there is not really a limit to what the brain can process, but there is a limit to what the body can process. If you do not align the speed of the brain with the speed of the body, at some point they become disconnected” (P11). She described the body as a caring medium “to be in line with earth” (P11), reinforcing its role as a medium for sensing the environment. Laozi similarly highlights this tension of embodiment as both vital and troublesome: The reason I have great trouble is that I have a body. When I no longer have a body, what trouble have I? (Laozi and Lau, 2003, Dao De Jing Verse 13) From a Daoist perspective, aligning body and mind constitutes a primary form of individual attunement, grounding reflection as meaning-making. Participants also emphasized harmonizing with situational flows, exemplified in Wu-Wei as attunement with circumstances without deliberate control. P10 described: “It is like following the flow to understand your meaning. Observe the current state of the world, interpret it, then combine that with your strengths and traits to find what you can meaningfully contribute.” (P10). In this sense, attunement redistributed agency from individual control toward circumstances, allowing responsive spontaneity to emerge. As P05 explained: “Because as long as you don’t reject ideas, you have an open mind. You will feel your growth will be really fast, because we don’t have our own prejudices, we don’t have a strong self-image.” (P05). Such openness allowed participants to connect broader situational flows with the details of everyday practice (Ames and Hall, 2003; Whitehead, 1929). Attunement also required holding instability. Participants frequently adopted a Yin–Yang perspective to accept uncertainty, discerning positive meaning within negative experiences. P10, for instance, reflected on a recent financial crisis: “Just this morning I cried with my wife because of financial problems. In the past, I would become very irritated, very sad and disappointed, and start to question why I was so useless or why I had gotten myself into such a difficult situation. But now I tell myself: maybe there is something positive here. Maybe life is trying to teach me a lesson.” (P10) This highlights how attunement involves neither rejecting negative emotions nor being consumed by them, but instead sustaining alignment through balance. At a broader level, attunement entails synchronizing personal rhythms with those of nature. P06 emphasized that a harmonious lifestyle aligned with natural cycles sustains health, while P16 described cultivating “nurturing life” practices in Singapore’s climate: “In a place like Singapore where there are no four distinct seasons… As a Chinese, I should sweat in such a hot situation, so I will give myself a chance to sweat a little every day, instead of staying in an air-conditioned room all the time… I want to say that this is a way of life that conforms to my genes.” (P16) Such alignment with natural rhythms illustrates a cosmological orientation in which humans, as products of the Dao, sustain harmony by living in accordance with its generative cycles (Liu, 2016). #### 5.3.2. Becoming While attunement emphasizes alignment, Daoist reflection also extends into a broader ontological mode of Becoming, grounded in transformation (Hua, 化 the Daoist concept of “化” is commonly translated in alignment with the English word “transformation”. (Tao, 2011)). But he didn’t know if he was Chuang Chou who had dreamt he was a butterfly, or a butterfly dreaming he was Chuang Chou. (Watson, 2013, Inner Chapter 02) Zhuangzi’s “Butterfly Dream” illustrates the meaning of Becoming: boundaries between self and other collapse, foregrounding transformation not as individual change but as relational becoming. Unlike HCI’s accounts of transformative reflection, often centered on behavioral shifts or new insights (Baumer, 2015; Moon, 2013; Fleck and Fitzpatrick, 2010), Daoist transformation challenges ego-centrism and autonomous subjectivity (Tan, 2020b; Tricker, 2022). Zhuangzi’s third-person narration dissolves the individual perspective into a relational field where all things co-constitute one another. Participants expressed this ontological becoming through ethical concern for others. P07 articulated: “Everything and self are actually one. We exist together in the Great One (大化).” (P07). This reflects Daoism’s de-anthropocentric orientation, negating subject–object distinctions and embracing “self-in-other” and “other-in-self” (Graham, 1989; Ho, 1995). P08 echoed this intersubjective stance, describing the presence of an “invisible Other” in his martial arts practice: “In my opinion, I think that we cannot think to be alone. Even if we go on a mountain and we want to stay alone, the Other one is always with us. What we call the other one. Maybe it is invisible, but there is.” (P08) is not derived from external moral codes, but arises from an awareness of interdependence and from harmony, rather than conflict, in co-shaping situations with others. Thus, Becoming extends reflection beyond Attunement ’s alignment of self with rhythms, toward relational transformation with others and the Dao. Participants’ reflections revealed how dissolving ego-bound identities enables coexistence with the Other, making Daoist reflective practice inherently ethical and critical. As P08 summarized: “To me, reflection is existence because when I think about what is my reflection in this moment, it is not about myself… the meaning of existence and the connection of existence with something invisible, this to me is the reflection.” (P08) ## 6. Discussion In this section, we articulate how the Daoist dimensions of reflection— Stillness, Resonance, Emergence —extend and reorient prevailing assumptions in HCI approaches to reflection. We emphasize the significance of emptiness as a generative begining for meaning-making, and highlight how an attuned mindset may counter negative emotions of rumination while opening possibilities for a turn toward reflecting-with. Building on these insights, we outline corresponding design implications. Finally, we point to Daoism, as a non-Western epistemology, as an opportunity to expand the exploratory space of conceptual framings in HCI. ### 6.1. Rethinking Reflection: Emptiness, Balance, and Relationality #### 6.1.1. Cultivating Emptiness for Reflection through Stillness Our exploration of Daoist texts and practices indicates that the practices of active forgetting and silence embedded in Stillness function as a reflective practice that creates space for meaning-making. Current studies for reflection often generate ready-made insights through AI-driven explanations or visualizations, which constrains reflection to the system’s framing of what counts as meaningful (Cho and et al., 2022). For example, many PI tools automatically interpret activity logs into labels such as “productive” (Kim et al., 2016) or “stressed” (van den Berg et al., 2025), presenting them as convincing evidence for gaining knowledge. Such representations of experience may constrain opportunities to pause, questions, or reframe what the data might mean in lived contexts. Daoism critiques approaches that amplify human desires and attempt to control or predict outcomes based on intentions and concepts detached from the actual context (D’Ambrosio, 2025; Zhang, 2025). Within this epistemology, forgetting is considered more vital to one’s spiritual life than remembering. It is articulated in far more radical stance: relinquishing the capacity for reasoning, letting go of analytic and cognitive activity, and forgetting accumulated knowledge. Such forgetting embodies a posture of refusal and release—of not being governed by anything (Chen, 2015). Correspondingly, our findings show that Daoist practices of forgetting and silence suspend the impulse to accept ready-made insights. By yielding and emptying, individuals could cultivate space for uncertainty and openness, allowing alternative interpretations of experiences to emerge. In Daoism, emptiness holds greater power than fullness, as Laozi describes the Dao: The way is empty, yet use will not drain it. (Laozi and Lau, 2003, Dao De Jing Verse 04) The cultivation of Stillness aligns with the Dao ’s ontological movement of reversion (Chen, 1964), a return to a primordial state of non-being and tranquility before the generation of all things. Participants described the forgetting practices of loosening attachment to social identities and seeking a self of Zi-Ran, while the functionally approximates Baumer’s notion of Inquiry (Baumer, 2015) or Fleck & Fitzpatrick’s R0 and R1 (Fleck and Fitzpatrick, 2010), it differs in method and intent: rather than reviewing past experiences to acquire knowledge, this “forgetting inquiry” opens space for the spontaneous emergence of new perspectives, that is, the continual negation of one’s assumed identities, knowledge, and positions in order to approach the Dao. Similarly, Akama’s articulation of Ma, 間 (emptiness) resonates here, where emptiness fostered sensitivity and relational connection in her work with Indigenous communities by suspending imposition and analysis (Akama, 2018). Stillness likewise serves as a complementary suspension by withholding words and explanation, Fritsch and colleagues show how silence enables deeper attunement to self, others, and environment, supporting awareness, enjoyment, and care (Fritsch et al., 2025), defining it as filled with sounds, interactions, and possibilities for participation rather than as absence. Thus, the emptiness generated by Stillness can be seen as an effective strategy for supporting reflection, even though it often considered as non-reflective practices (Fleck and Fitzpatrick, 2010), as Sartre notes, “it is the non-reflective consciousness which renders the reflection possible” (Sartre et al., 2022), a primordial state that is a foundation that allows one to then step back and reflect from. Stillness constitutes a reflective dimension that enables the spontaneous emergence of meaning, suggesting that reflective technologies might extend beyond scaffolding the reflective phase itself to instead act as flexible enablers that guide individuals into reflective moments. Unlike breakdowns triggered by external systems (Baumer, 2015), Stillness lies in its proactive orientation—cultivating meaning through the deliberate release of identity and the emptying of thought. While these findings highlight the methodological significance of Stillness, its potential has not yet been fully recognized in designing technologies for reflection. Some efforts in HCI have moved in adjacent directions; for instance, slow technology (Hallnäs and Redström, 2001) and interactive systems inspired by contemporary mindfulness aim to create a sense of tranquility and guide individuals to focus on the present (Asadi et al., 2023; Prpa et al., 2018; Zhu et al., 2017; Markum and Toyama, 2020). To promote individual reflection, such technologies often rely on the materiality of artifacts (Odom et al., 2012b; Asadi et al., 2023) and specific physical spaces (Järvelä et al., 2021). Meanwhile, some artifacts that support slowness still encourage users to engage in reasoning by introducing deliberately constructed counterfactual patterns that make friction noticeable (Dewey, 1997; Kant, 2000) —such as SoundMirror and ChatterBox (Hallnäs and Redström, 2001). Others evoke reflection by designing temporalities through which one’s personal historical data resurfaces in irregular ways (Odom et al., 2019, 2020, 2012b; Chen et al., 2023), subtly reinforcing reflection as a mind-centered activity. Instead, Stillness foregrounds Zi-Ran, allowing naturalness to emerge rather than arise from deliberate intervention by enabling reflection through intentional forgetting and linguistic silence. In this sense, we advocate for designing technologies that cultivate the art of forgetting for spontaneous reflection, which aims to fracture externalized information generated by individuals through technology (Ankenbauer and Brewer, 2025; Sas and Whittaker, 2013). The assumption in reflective technologies that privileges recording, representing, interpreting, and revisiting information while neglecting forgetting and silence—reveals a computational metaphor of the human mind that frames these necessary, seemingly passive human activities as deficiencies (Bannon, 2006; Baumer et al., 2014). For example, similar to Homewood et al.’s finding that removal creates space for critical reflection (Homewood et al., 2020), the art of forgetting may advocate designing PI tools that adopt more radical forms of resistance toward data, where individuals’ tracked information is automatically cleared at regular intervals after being recorded. This allows users to reflect and interpret their experiences subjectively, thereby moving closer to a sense of self-authenticity (Su and Stolterman, 2016), rather than “reality” as interpreted by presets and data representations. Additionally, shifting reflective prompts from cognitive questions to guiding individuals’ bodily sensations, and incorporating estrangement strategies (Wilde et al., 2017), can enable reflection to emerge through defamiliarizing body rather than purely mental activity, while the quieting of external technological noise further moves the individual from outward attention to inward bodily sensing. #### 6.1.2. Flowing with Uncertainties: Reflective Attunement In our findings, Daoist practitioners place importance on attuning with situation (Ott, 2024). Rather than actively setting and pursuing fixed goals, they adopt a mindset of Wu-Wei, flexibly adapting to changes in life, flowing like water, and allowing meaning to emerge naturally in each moment. From this perspective, reflection shifts away from viewing behavioral change as an external goal (Consolvo et al., 2009; Ploderer et al., 2014), and instead focuses on aligning actions with one’s existing rhythms and priorities. This flexible stance of non-orientation through Attunement resembles what Ahmed describes as disorientation (Ahmed, 2020), a willingness to be thrown off course. Also, Daoist practitioners approach this condition through the generative posture of Yin-Yang, which enables them to respond more gracefully to life’s uncertainty, finding “joy and excitement in the horror” (Merleau-Ponty, 1945). In everyday reflection, this position allows them to recognize how negative experiences may tilt toward new forms of growth. This Daoist posture invites individuals to dwell with uncertainty and attune to its flows, allowing meaning to surface naturally rather than being actively constructed, echoing Laozi in the Dao De Jing: It is on disaster that good fortune perches. (Laozi and Lau, 2003, Dao De Jing Verse 58) In HCI, many systems that address negative emotions around reflection are designed to help users manage, regulate, or reframe those emotions toward positive outcomes. Prior work has focused on cultivating self-compassion in emotion intervention tools (Smeets et al., 2014), reframing emotional attributes (Eikey et al., 2021), and more recently, Jung et al. proposed a data reinterpretation method (Jung et al., 2025), which enables individuals to contextualize unmet goals in tracking tools as understandable situations rather than personal failures. These are important contributions, yet they often remain aligned with an instrumental logic: negative feelings are treated as obstacles to be resolved on the way to improved functioning, productivity, or well-being. From a Daoist standpoint, this risks narrowing the space of reflection to what can be converted into positive, growth-oriented narratives. Our findings suggest a different orientation: instead of steering users away from negative states, reflective technologies could help individuals dwell-with negativity and uncertainty, attending closely to how negative experiences evolve and change. This attunement-based stance has concrete implications for design. Rather than presenting emotional or behavioral data in rigid, evaluative formats (such as charts that implicitly encode success or failure), systems could offer more open, ambiguous, and non-judgmental representations (Toebosch et al., 2024; Hollis et al., 2018). For example, designers can explore how image-generating technologies create abstract and ambiguous content that allow users to visualize and explore further allowing users to feel positive tendencies (Park et al., 2025) hidden within feelings of frustration or self-doubt through ambiguity and uncertainty. Importantly, such designs depend on context-sensitive AI strategies (Fang et al., 2025; Nepal et al., 2024) that capture emotions and behaviors closely tied to users’ lived situations and generate representations embedded in everyday experience, rather than simplified numerical indicators (Choe et al., 2014; Khovanskaya et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2022), which are more likely to provoke reflection and support dwelling-with. In addition, data physicalization (Jansen et al., 2015; Thudt et al., 2018) may provide an effective approach, transforming negative data into perceivable physical forms that connect records with tangible haptic interfaces. For example, by leveraging temperature or deformation to produce sensations of “comfort” (Daudén Roquet and Sas, 2021), technology can foster a sense of acceptance for individuals. Furthermore, these orientations invite a rethinking of technological mediation (Verbeek, 2006). Rather than functioning as a dominant filter that dictates how the world is revealed or how emotions should be regulated, technology can be designed as a device for attunement: something that sensitizes users to the nuances of their situations and supports moment-to-moment responsiveness. This stance challenges the instrumental rationality and the logic of blind action embedded in technologies, as well as their neglect of temporal critique. In this mode, technologies are stripped of their intrinsic value and are seen merely as tools for achieving future goals, leading to to a lack of engagement with what is immediately present (Wenning, 2011). In a Daoist Wu-Wei oreintation, however, technologies do not aggressively demand attention or enforce explicit lessons. Instead, they recede into the background, offering subtle cues or openings that help individuals stay in touch with the flow of their circumstances. This repositions reflective technologies not as instruments for controlling or correcting experience, but as companions that help people abide in uncertainty, listening, adjusting, and co-creating meaning as situations unfold. #### 6.1.3. As an Assemblage: From Reflection to Reflecting-with In HCI, higher levels of reflection, those that involve questioning the self, rethinking the current state of the world, and envisioning alternatives (Baumer, 2015; Fleck and Fitzpatrick, 2010), remain particularly difficult to scaffold through technology. While interactive systems have explored ways to stimulate reflection, most tools focus on instrumental knowledge enhancement, which could help people monitor, manage, or optimize aspects of their lives (Cho and et al., 2022; Luo et al., 2025), yet they struggle to foster critical reflection (Mezirow et al., 1990). This is becoming even more challenging with the growing impulse to delegate critical reflection to AI (Gould et al., 2024), which risks reinforcing cognitive shortcuts rather than cultivating deeper attunement (consistent with the notions of R3 and R4, which refer to perspective-taking and attention to ethical concerns (Fleck and Fitzpatrick, 2010; Lee et al., 2023)). Daoism positions reflection as an ongoing process of relational emergence and situational harmony (Li, 2025). Our findings reveal that participants loosen and sensitize the self through forgetting and silence (Stillness), attend to inner awareness and situational changes (Resonance), and strive for attunement with the lively body, context, and nature, thereby refining their awareness of relational Emergence. This reflects a Daoist ontology in which the self is never isolated but continually formed through interactions with the world. In this way criticality and ethics arise not from detached analysis but from continuously repositioning one’s assumptions and stance through relational engagement, demonstrating a dynamic, embodied, and relational posthumanist subjectivity (Braidotti, 2013). Through such attunement, individuals could achieve a more nuanced integration of the self by interpreting encounters with the world, others, and themselves (Mezirow et al., 1990). Building on this, we propose reflecting-with as a sensitising concept and ontological commitment for technology design. Inspired by Haraway’s “thinking-with” (Haraway, 2016) and more-than-human approaches (Wakkary, 2021; Oogjes and Wakkary, 2022; Giaccardi and Redström, 2020; Smith et al., 2017), reflecting-with emphasizes that reflection unfolds in relation with body, situation, others, and more-than-human entities, emerging through encounters, creating a shared continuity (Zhao, 2020) and fostering kinships with what is in formation (Haraway, 2016). For instance, the WavData Lamp (Zhong et al., 2025) predicts individual’s music-listening habits through a physical visualization that changes shape and light color, maintaining a close entanglement with users in their everyday environments, thereby creating an open and generative space for reflection; Areca (Cho and Nam, 2025), an IoT-based AI air purifier, records emotional diaries of shared environments, and when people gradually perceive it as a co-dwelling presence rather than mere equipment, such devices foster intimacy and evoke empathy. Accordingly, reflecting-with suggests that HCI researchers need to move beyond human-centered tools that trigger reflection primarily through data collection and display, and instead consider the agency of technological artifacts in reflection-support systems, attending closely to human–artifact entanglements (Frauenberger, 2019; Cho and Nam, 2025; Wakkary et al., 2022). In this sense, interactive systems that support reflection should themselves embody the stance of Wu-Wei and Zi-Ran (Zhang, 2025), responding fluidly to everyday situations rather than following predetermined principles. Instead of passively collecting personal data and turning it into dashboard, such systems should proactively transform this information into situational variations through which individuals can be affected, constructing polyphonic narratives through their material and temporal entanglements with users. This illuminates reflection as an encounter rather than a process defined by who reflects or what is being reflected upon, and is designed to foster shared intentionality between humans and artifacts (Somanath et al., 2022) in order to enhance the generativity of meaning-making. Furthermore, another possibility we advocate is the integration of more-than-human tracking into PI systems, aligning personal data collection with natural rhythms by incorporating ecological cycles (Chung et al., 2025) and multi-dimensional social-contextual information (time factors, seasonal factors, sensory data, spatial factors and values, etc.) (Sun et al., 2025) into the tracking process. Although this approach still presupposes certain data points, its deeper aim is not self-optimization but enabling individuals to cultivate a more nuanced, embodied, and relational reflection between their bodies and environments at a cosmological level. Lastly, This entangled stance reflected in reflecting-with should not be mistaken for the “self-disappearance” often associated with quantified self-paradigms (Rapp and Tirassa, 2017), where individuals can be reduced to mere data points. Daoist dissolution instead signals an expanded capacity for connection with the broader world, extending reflection into the dimension of care (de La Bellacasa, 2017; Wakkary et al., 2022), when we reflect-with rather than reflect on, ensuring an accountability to other entangled entities, human and non-human, fostering responsibility and responsiveness to our shared situations. ### 6.2. Daoist Epistemologies for Rethinking Reflection in HCI With regard to reflection, HCI has largely drawn on Western discourses (Dewey, 1997; Moon, 2013; Schön, 1984; Norman, 2014; Agre, 1997). These traditions privilege analytical reasoning and emphasize “scientific”, “reductionist”, and “techno-solutionist” orientations (Law et al., 2015; Lindtner et al., 2018), often separating knowledge from the lived and embodied contexts of a knower (Smith, 2006). This epistemological basis has shaped technologies for reflection that are designed for optimization but struggle to engage users’ embodied presence, ethical sensibilities, and aesthetic attunements. In practice, however, reflective moments arise within everyday circumstances that rarely conform to such idealized cognitive models, unfolding instead within fluid, situated, and often non-deliberate modes of experience. Recently, HCI scholars have drawn on critical and postmodern perspectives, including feminist Science and Technologies Studies (STS) (Haraway, 2013a, 2016), new materialism (Barad, 2007; Bennett, 2020), and posthumanism (Braidotti, 2013; Forlano, 2017), to unsettle binaries such as subject/object, culture/nature, and material/discursive. These theoretical lenses share a commitment to ethics grounded in the immanent, material conditions of the world, recognizing humans as participants in its continual constitution (Geerts and Carstens, 2019). They also signal a shift in HCI toward more entangled, relational, and materially situated modes of inquiry (Dedeoğlu and Chandra, 2025). Daoism resonates with these critical and postmodern trajectories but also contributes its own distinctive epistemic resources. Specifically, it offers a Dao -centered cosmology in which the Dao functions as the generative cosmic force of all things (Miller, 2003; Watts, 1977; Liu, 2014; Nojonen, 2019). This cosmology emphasizes a radical entanglement across beings and resisting the “god-trick” (Haraway, 2013b) that abstracts humans from their relations in order to reflect from a distance. By situating all existence within the generative unfolding of the Dao, we challenge human exceptionalism and redefines reflection as Stillness, Resonance, and Emergence, through observing, attuning to and co-existing with natural rhythms rather than self-centric controlling. In such a condition, individuals cultivate a cosmological sense of Gan-Ying, dissolving boundaries across species and recognize an inseparable condition of self and other. Daoism thus envisions humans as always reflecting and becoming with the world (Barad, 2007), acknowledging the inherent limits of human agency and the need for humility. This Daoist turn also extends accounts of embodied epistemology. While soma design (Hook, 2018) in HCI and Daoism both emphasize a holistic view of body and mind (Shusterman, 2015), Daoism places the body within flows of Qi and the rhythms of others and nature. Based on this embodied ontology (Freiler, 2007; Slingerland, 2019), the shenti (身体) in Daoism is not an individual’s possession, but rather a body that is in Resonance with the wider world it is entangled with. It maintains harmony with the rhythms of cosmos (Schroeder, 2022; Liu, 2008; Kohn, 2009) through inward Listening and external Observation. As noted by Fritsch et al., soma design currently lacks strategies for engaging with others and the broader ecological system (Fritsch et al., 2025). A Daoist framing offers such strategies: Stillness and Attunement cultivate sensitivity not only to one’s inner sensation but also to how one’s corporeal body is affected by other beings’ presence and rhythms (Núñez-Pacheco and Poikolainen Rosén, 2024; Höök et al., 2021). This orientation invites inquiry into the enounters that emerge between one’s own body and the bodies of others, imagining the body as an emergent, porous, and entangled cosmological interface (Homewood et al., 2021; Peng, 2025). Additionally, in current HCI research, technologies for reflection have been designed with individualistic, problem-solving, and goal-oriented aims (Baumer, 2015; Fleck and Fitzpatrick, 2010), privileging epistemologies that are self-centered and instrumental. Such systems often overlook relational and emergent forms of knowing, sidelining the ethical sensibilities that arise through relationality. In contrast, Daoist cosmology (Ames, 2011; Zhao and Murris, 2021) is guided by an ethics that respects differences and honors the nature of the “Other” (Huang, 2010). Actions emerge through mutual responsiveness and care, creating a performativity of poiesis in action within morally constituted assemblages (Pickering, 2019). In these assemblages, practitioners relinquish self-centered perspectives and preconceived knowledge, adapting with others to the unfolding flow of the Dao, a collaborative process of “way (Dao)-making" (Zhang, 2025). This epistemological orientation challenges the individualistic, self-protective stance still implicit in Schön’s reflection-in-action (Schön, 1984), where the actor maintains a sense of control over objects and situations rather than engaging in a shared agency (Tan, 2020b). Daoism instead suggests reflection as an ethico-onto-epistemology, where knowing, doing, and being emerge together through relational regard. These commitments also carry practical implications for making, crafting, and Research-through-Design. The Daoist stories of Woodworker Qing, who forgets his own body to perceive a tree’s “inner heaven” (Chuang, 2000; Ott, 2024), and Cook Ding, who follows the natural articulations of an ox by “ perceiving with his spirit rather than his eyes ” (Chuang, 2000), illustrate this vividly. Both artisans embody a humble stance of not-knowing when engaging with materials, sensing and responding to the nature of things rather than imposing one’s own intellect as universally valid. Their expertise lies not in control but in adapting fluidly to unfolding situations, entering a process of becoming-with the other amidst differences. While contemporary more-than-human scholarship highlights material agency, it echoes aspects of this posture (Kim et al., 2023; Ofer et al., 2021; Song et al., 2022; Tomico et al., 2025), yet a Daoist orientation suggests an even more delicate integration of one’s embodied feelings with non-human rhythms to achieve “harmony between heaven and humanity" (天人合一). This orientation invites a shift toward the notion of cosmotechnics when considering how technologies are designed in HCI (Hui, 2019), a form of technical activity that unifies cosmic order and moral order, treating technology as a type of relation rather than an entity. Cosmotechnics foregrounds the ethical grammars embedded in technical action (Engchuan, 2021), aligning human reflective agency with the self-soing of nature and Other beings. This shift moves HCI beyond anthropocentrism toward cosmological attunement and shared becoming. ## 7. Conclusion & Limitations Our study demonstrates how Daoist philosophy can serve as a generative lens for rethinking reflection toward epistemic plurality in HCI. By examining Daoist concepts alongside participants’ accounts, we highlighted alternative dimensions of reflection that move beyond cognitive, deliberative, or outcome-driven framings, and call on HCI researchers to consider embodied, situational, relational, and ethical dimensions when designing interactive systems for reflection. We must acknowledge that in this study it was difficult to entirely avoid using Western philosophical terminology when discussing Eastern philosophical thought. However, such comparison or juxtaposition is necessary for readers in the HCI academic community, which is rooted in Western traditions, to understand when introducing non-Western epistemologies, hence, we strive to sensitively use philosophical terms from both epistemologies in our discussion. Furthermore, the Daoist dimensions of reflection we identified may also embody transcendental and embodied qualities that are difficult to articulate textually. Future research could thus envision embodied workshops as a way to move beyond the limitations of textual expression, enabling broader Western audiences lacking cultural background to apprehend these qualities experientially and through alternative forms (Yoo et al., 2025). In conclusion, Daoism offers underexplored epistemic resources with the potential to open new research agendas in the HCI community. Exploring such Eastern epistemologies is particularly important given that Asia (and other regions of the Global South) has long been positioned as an “empirical other” rather than as an “epistemic other” capable of challenging the arrogance of universalism (Singh, 2010), respecting the cosmological locality of technologies (Hui, 2025; Guerrero Millan et al., 2024, p148). Our study contributes to the recent ontological turn in HCI and STS (Frauenberger, 2019) by offering an exploration through Eastern discourses. It acknowledges decentralized ontologies beyond dominant paradigms (Pickering, 2017), as a way of “critically imagining other forms of knowing-being-doing”, and gestures toward a pluriverse of interdependence (Escobar, 2018). ## References - (1) - Agre (1997) Philip Agre. 1997. Computation and human experience. Cambridge University Press. - Agre (2014) Philip E Agre. 2014. Toward a critical technical practice: Lessons learned in trying to reform AI. In Social science, technical systems, and cooperative work. Psychology Press, 131–157. - Ahmed (2020) Sara Ahmed. 2020. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Duke University Press. - Ahn et al. (2025) Sooyeon Ahn, Wonkwang Son, Hui Yeong Baek, and Hwajung Hong. 2025. Designing OWN, The Inner World as a Virtual Space: By and For Introspection. In Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 69–82. doi: 10.1145/3698061.3726951 - Akama (2012) Yoko Akama. 2012. A ‘way of being’ in design: Zen and the art of being a human-centred practitioner. Design Philosophy Papers 10, 1 (2012), 63–80. - Akama (2018) Yoko Akama. 2018. A finger pointing at the moon: absence, emptiness and Ma in design. In Undesign. Routledge, 111–121. - Akama et al. (2020) Yoko Akama, Ann Light, and Takahito Kamihira. 2020. Expanding participation to design with more-than-human concerns. In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020-Participation (s) Otherwise-Volume 1. 1–11. - Ames and Hall (2003) Roger Ames and David Hall. 2003. Dao De Jing A Philosophical Translation. Ballantine, New York. - Ames (2011) Roger T Ames. 2011. Confucian role ethics: A vocabulary. The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press. - Ankenbauer and Brewer (2025) Sam Addison Ankenbauer and Robin N Brewer. 2025. Time’s Sublimest Target: Practices of Forgetting in HCI and CSCW. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 9, 1 (2025), 1–24. - Asadi et al. (2023) Yasamin Asadi, Margot Brereton, Aloha Hufana Ambe, Alessandro Soro, and Mahnoosh Kholghi. 2023. Calming Down in Lockdown: Rethinking Technologies for a Slower Pace of Life. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1002–1014. - Aseniero et al. (2020) Bon Adriel Aseniero, Charles Perin, Wesley Willett, Anthony Tang, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2020. Activity river: Visualizing planned and logged personal activities for reflection. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. 1–9. - Bae et al. (2014) Jae-eul Bae, Youn-kyung Lim, Jin-bae Bang, and Myung-suk Kim. 2014. Ripening room: designing social media for self-reflection in self-expression. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. 103–112. - Banner (2018) Matthew Banner. 2018. Wu-wei: Concept analysis of a conceptual paradox. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 39, 4 (2018), 304–310. - Bannon (2006) Liam J Bannon. 2006. Forgetting as a feature, not a bug: the dualityof memory and implications for ubiquitous computing. CoDesign 2, 01 (2006), 3–15. - Barad (2007) Karen Barad. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press, Durham, N.C., Chesham. - Bardzell et al. (2021) Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Ann Light. 2021. Wanting to live here: Design after anthropocentric functionalism. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–24. - Bardzell (2010) Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1301–1310. - Baumer (2015) Eric P.S. Baumer. 2015. Reflective Informatics: Conceptual Dimensions for Designing Technologies of Reflection. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 585–594. doi: 10.1145/2702123.2702234 - Baumer et al. (2014) Eric PS Baumer, Vera Khovanskaya, Mark Matthews, Lindsay Reynolds, Victoria Schwanda Sosik, and Geri Gay. 2014. Reviewing reflection: on the use of reflection in interactive system design. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. 93–102. - Bennett (2020) Jane Bennett. 2020. Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press. - Bentvelzen et al. (2022) Marit Bentvelzen, Paweł W Woźniak, Pia SF Herbes, Evropi Stefanidi, and Jasmin Niess. 2022. Revisiting reflection in hci: Four design resources for technologies that support reflection. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 1 (2022), 1–27. - Berkson (2005) Mark A. Berkson. 2005. Conceptions of self/no-self and modes of connection: comparative soteriological structures in classical Chinese thought. Journal of Religious Ethics 33, 2 (2005), 293–331. - Bhattacharjee et al. (2023) Ananya Bhattacharjee, Dana Kulzhabayeva, Mohi Reza, Harsh Kumar, Eunchae Seong, Xuening Wu, Mohammad Rashidujjaman Rifat, Robert Bowman, Rachel Kornfield, Alex Mariakakis, et al. 2023. Integrating individual and social contexts into self-reflection technologies. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6. - Bødker (2006) Susanne Bødker. 2006. When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles. 1–8. - Botelho (2021) Natashia Botelho. 2021. Reflection in motion: An embodied approach to reflection on practice. Reflective Practice 22, 2 (2021), 147–158. - Braidotti (2013) Rosi Braidotti. 2013. The Posthuman. Polity press, Cambridge. - Braun and Clarke (2006) Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. - Chen et al. (2023) Amy Yo Sue Chen, William Odom, Carman Neustaedter, Ce Zhong, and Henry Lin. 2023. Exploring Memory-Oriented Interactions with Digital Photos In and Across Time: A Field Study of Chronoscope. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 631, 20 pages. doi: 10.1145/3544548.3581012 - Chen (1964) Chung-Hwan Chen. 1964. What Does Lao-Tzu Mean by the Term ‘Tao. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 4, 2 (1964), 150–161. - Chen (2015) Xia Chen. 2015. Memory and Forgetfulness in Daoism. Memory: A history (2015), 176. - Cheng (1986) Chung-ying Cheng. 1986. On the Environmental Ethics of the Tao and the Ch’i. Environmental Ethics 8, 4 (1986), 351–370. - Cho and Nam (2025) Hyungjun Cho and Tek-Jin Nam. 2025. Living Alongside Areca: Exploring Human Experiences with Things Expressing Thoughts and Emotions. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi-org.libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/10.1145/3706598.3713228 - Cho et al. (2021) Janghee Cho, Laura Devendorf, and Stephen Voida. 2021. From the art of reflection to the art of noticing: A shifting view of self-tracking technologies’ role in supporting sustainable food practices. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. - Cho and et al. (2022) Janghee Cho and et al. 2022. Reflection in theory and reflection in practice: an exploration of the gaps in reflection support among personal informatics apps. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. - Choe et al. (2017) Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, Haining Zhu, Nathalie Henry Riche, and Dominikus Baur. 2017. Understanding self-reflection: how people reflect on personal data through visual data exploration. In Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. 173–182. - Choe et al. (2014) Eun Kyoung Choe, Nicole B Lee, Bongshin Lee, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A Kientz. 2014. Understanding quantified-selfers’ practices in collecting and exploring personal data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1143–1152. - Chuang (2000) Tzu Chuang. 2000. Wandering on the Way: Early Taoist Tales and Parables of Chuang Tzu. University of Hawaii Press. - Chung et al. (2025) Ji Won Chung, Robin Yuan, Kirsi-Marja Zitting, Jiahua Chen, Neil Xu, Nediyana Daskalova, and Jeff Huang. 2025. Beyond the Circadian Rhythm: Variable Cycles of Regularity Found in Long-Term Sleep Tracking. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1180, 18 pages. doi: 10.1145/3706598.3713868 - Claisse and Durrant (2023) Caroline Claisse and Abigail C Durrant. 2023. ‘Keeping our Faith Alive’: investigating Buddhism practice during covid-19 to inform design for the online community practice of faith. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–19. - Clarà (2015) Marc Clarà. 2015. What is reflection? Looking for clarity in an ambiguous notion. Journal of teacher education 66, 3 (2015), 261–271. - Consolvo et al. (2009) Sunny Consolvo, David W McDonald, and James A Landay. 2009. Theory-driven design strategies for technologies that support behavior change in everyday life. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 405–414. - Cunningham et al. (2023) Jay Cunningham, Gabrielle Benabdallah, Daniela Rosner, and Alex Taylor. 2023. On the grounds of solutionism: Ontologies of blackness and HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 30, 2 (2023), 1–17. - D’Ambrosio (2025) Paul D’Ambrosio. 2025. A Daoist-Inspired Critique of AI’s Promises: Patterns, Predictions, Control. Religions 16, 10 (2025), 1247. - Daudén Roquet and Sas (2021) Claudia Daudén Roquet and Corina Sas. 2021. Interoceptive Interaction: An Embodied Metaphor Inspired Approach to Designing for Meditation. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 265, 17 pages. doi: 10.1145/3411764.3445137 - de La Bellacasa (2017) Maria Puig de La Bellacasa. 2017. Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. Vol. 41. U of Minnesota Press. - De Prycker (2011) Valérie De Prycker. 2011. Unself-conscious Control: Broadening the Notion of Control through Experiences of Flow and Wu-Wei. Zygon® 46, 1 (2011), 5–25. - Dedeoğlu and Chandra (2025) Çağdaş Dedeoğlu and Priyank Chandra. 2025. Navigating the Posthuman Turn in Computing and Design: A Posthuman Vocabulary. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies. 504–529. - Dewey (1997) John Dewey. 1997. How We Think. Dover Publications, Mineola, NY. Original work published 1910. - Ding et al. (2020) Yudan Ding, Li Wang, Jindong Chen, Jingping Zhao, and Wenbin Guo. 2020. Chinese Taoist cognitive therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety in adults in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in psychology 11 (2020), 769. - Dourish and Bell (2011) Paul Dourish and Genevieve Bell. 2011. Divining a digital future: Mess and mythology in ubiquitous computing. Mit Press. - Edwards and Nicoll (2006) Richard Edwards and Katherine Nicoll. 2006. Expertise, competence and reflection in the rhetoric of professional development. British Educational Research Journal 32, 1 (2006), 115–131. - Eikey et al. (2021) Elizabeth Victoria Eikey, Clara Marques Caldeira, Mayara Costa Figueiredo, Yunan Chen, Jessica L. Borelli, Melissa Mazmanian, and Kai Zheng. 2021. Beyond self-reflection: introducing the concept of rumination in personal informatics. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 25, 3 (May 2021), 601–616. doi: 10.1007/s00779-021-01573-w - Eikey and Reddy (2017) Elizabeth V. Eikey and Madhu C. Reddy. 2017. "It’s Definitely Been a Journey": A Qualitative Study on How Women with Eating Disorders Use Weight Loss Apps. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 642–654. doi: 10.1145/3025453.3025591 - Engchuan (2021) Rosalia Namsai Engchuan. 2021. Lifepatch. Situated Assemblages of Un-Situated Things | Afterall. https://www.afterall.org/articles/lifepatch-situated-assemblages-of-un-situated-things-2/ - Epstein et al. (2020) Daniel A Epstein, Clara Caldeira, Mayara Costa Figueiredo, Xi Lu, Lucas M Silva, Lucretia Williams, Jong Ho Lee, Qingyang Li, Simran Ahuja, Qiuer Chen, et al. 2020. Mapping and taking stock of the personal informatics literature. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 4 (2020), 1–38. - Epstein et al. (2015) Daniel A Epstein, An Ping, James Fogarty, and Sean A Munson. 2015. A lived informatics model of personal informatics. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. 731–742. - Escobar (2018) Arturo Escobar. 2018. Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press. - Fang et al. (2025) Cathy Mengying Fang, Yasith Samaradivakara, Pattie Maes, and Suranga Nanayakkara. 2025. Mirai: A Wearable Proactive AI" Inner-Voice" for Contextual Nudging. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–9. - Fang (2012) Tony Fang. 2012. Yin Yang: A new perspective on culture. Management and organization Review 8, 1 (2012), 25–50. - Feng (1983) Youlan Feng. 1983. A history of Chinese philosophy. Vol. 1. Princeton University Press. - Fleck and Fitzpatrick (2010) Rowanne Fleck and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2010. Reflecting on reflection: framing a design landscape. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction (Brisbane, Australia) (OZCHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 216–223. doi: 10.1145/1952222.1952269 - Fook (2016) Jan Fook. 2016. Finding fundamental meaning through critical reflection. In Practising spirituality: Reflections on meaning-making in personal and professional contexts. Springer, 17–29. - Forlano (2017) Laura Forlano. 2017. Posthumanism and design. She Ji: The journal of design, economics, and Innovation 3, 1 (2017), 16–29. - Frauenberger (2016) Christopher Frauenberger. 2016. Critical realist HCI. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 341–351. - Frauenberger (2019) Christopher Frauenberger. 2019. Entanglement HCI The Next Wave? ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 27, 1, Article 2 (Nov. 2019), 27 pages. doi: 10.1145/3364998 - Freiler (2007) Tammy Jo Freiler. 2007. Bridging traditional boundaries of knowing: Revaluing mind/body connections through experiences of embodiment. (2007). - Fritsch et al. (2025) Jonas Fritsch, Kristina Höök, Claudia Núñez Pacheco, Pedro Sanches, Anna Ståhl, and Vasiliki Tsaknaki. 2025. Estrangement through Silence. In Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 929–943. doi: 10.1145/3715336.3735711 - Gao et al. (2022) Ze Gao, Anqi Wang, Pan Hui, and Tristan Braud. 2022. Meditation in Motion: Interactive Media Art Visualization Based on Ancient Tai Chi Chuan. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (Lisboa, Portugal) (MM ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 7241–7242. doi: 10.1145/3503161.3549967 - Geerts and Carstens (2019) Evelien Geerts and Delphi Carstens. 2019. Ethico-onto-epistemology. (2019). - Giaccardi and Redström (2020) Elisa Giaccardi and Johan Redström. 2020. Technology and more-than-human design. Design Issues 36, 4 (2020), 33–44. - Gould et al. (2024) Sandy JJ Gould, Duncan P Brumby, and Anna L Cox. 2024. ChatTL; DR–You really ought to check what the LLM said on your behalf. In Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–7. - Graham (1989) A C Graham. 1989. Disputers of the Tao : philosophical argument in ancient China. Open Court, La Salle, Ill. - Grant et al. (2002) Anthony M Grant, John Franklin, and Peter Langford. 2002. The self-reflection and insight scale: A new measure of private self-consciousness. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 30, 8 (2002), 821–835. - Guerrero Millan et al. (2024) Carlos Guerrero Millan, Bettina Nissen, and Larissa Pschetz. 2024. Cosmovision of data: An indigenous approach to technologies for self-determination. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13. - Hallnäs and Redström (2001) Lars Hallnäs and Johan Redström. 2001. Slow technology–designing for reflection. Personal and ubiquitous computing 5, 3 (2001), 201–212. - Hansen (2025) Chad Hansen. 2025. Daoism. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2025 ed.), Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman (Eds.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. - Haraway (2013a) Donna Haraway. 2013a. A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In The transgender studies reader. Routledge, 103–118. - Haraway (2013b) Donna Haraway. 2013b. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective 1. In Women, science, and technology. Routledge, 455–472. - Haraway (2016) Donna Haraway. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press, Durham. - Henchoz et al. (2021) Nicolas Henchoz, Margaux Charvolin, Delphine Ribes, Lara Défayes, Cédric DuchÊne, Emily Groves, and Andreas Sonderegger. 2021. Ming Shan Digital Experience: Immersive Technology for Traditional Taoist Meditation. Proc. ACM Comput. Graph. Interact. Tech. 4, 2, Article 24 (Aug. 2021), 10 pages. doi: 10.1145/3465620 - Ho (1995) David YF Ho. 1995. Selfhood and identity in confucianism, taoism, buddhism, and hinduism: Contrasts with the west. Journal for the theory of social behaviour (1995). - Hollis et al. (2018) Victoria Hollis, Alon Pekurovsky, Eunika Wu, and Steve Whittaker. 2018. On being told how we feel: how algorithmic sensor feedback influences emotion perception. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 3 (2018), 1–31. - Homewood et al. (2021) Sarah Homewood, Marika Hedemyr, Maja Fagerberg Ranten, and Susan Kozel. 2021. Tracing conceptions of the body in HCI: From user to more-than-human. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12. - Homewood et al. (2020) Sarah Homewood, Amanda Karlsson, and Anna Vallgårda. 2020. Removal as a method: A fourth wave HCI approach to understanding the experience of self-tracking. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM designing interactive systems conference. 1779–1791. - Hook (2018) Kristina Hook. 2018. Designing with the body: Somaesthetic interaction design. MIt Press. - Höök et al. (2021) Kristina Höök, Steve Benford, Paul Tennent, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Miquel Alfaras, Juan Martinez Avila, Christine Li, Joseph Marshall, Claudia Daudén Roquet, Pedro Sanches, et al. 2021. Unpacking non-dualistic design: The soma design case. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 28, 6 (2021), 1–36. - Huang (2010) Yong Huang. 2010. Respecting different ways of life: A Daoist ethics of virtue in the Zhuangzi. The Journal of Asian Studies 69, 4 (2010), 1049–1069. - Hui (2019) Yuk Hui. 2019. The question concerning technology in China: An essay in cosmotechnics. Vol. 3. mit Press. - Hui (2025) Yuk Hui. 2025. Thinking at the Boundary of the Machine (在机器的边界思考). (2025). - Hung and Yeh (2013) Yung-Shan Hung and Shih-Fen Yeh. 2013. The aesthetics of curriculum and taoism. International Journal of Chinese Education 2, 1 (2013), 54–69. - Ibrahim et al. (2024) Zaidat Ibrahim, Novia Nurain, and James Clawson. 2024. Tracking during Ramadan: Examining the intersection of menstrual and religious tracking practices among muslim women in the United States. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–19. - Ixer (1999) Graham Ixer. 1999. There’s no such thing as reflection. The British Journal of Social Work 29, 4 (1999), 513–527. - Jansen et al. (2015) Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, Petra Isenberg, Jason Alexander, Abhijit Karnik, Johan Kildal, Sriram Subramanian, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2015. Opportunities and challenges for data physicalization. In proceedings of the 33rd annual acm conference on human factors in computing systems. 3227–3236. - Järvelä et al. (2021) Simo Järvelä, Benjamin Cowley, Mikko Salminen, Giulio Jacucci, Juho Hamari, and Niklas Ravaja. 2021. Augmented Virtual Reality Meditation: Shared Dyadic Biofeedback Increases Social Presence Via Respiratory Synchrony. Trans. Soc. Comput. 4, 2, Article 6 (May 2021), 19 pages. doi: 10.1145/3449358 - Jeon et al. (2025) Hayeon Jeon, Suhwoo Yoon, Keyeun Lee, Seo Hyeong Kim, Esther Hehsun Kim, Seonghye Cho, Yena Ko, Soeun Yang, Laura Dabbish, John Zimmerman, Eun-mee Kim, and Hajin Lim. 2025. Letters from Future Self: Augmenting the Letter-Exchange Exercise with LLM-based Agents to Enhance Young Adults’ Career Exploration. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 100, 21 pages. doi: 10.1145/3706598.3714206 - Jiang and Ahmadpour (2022) Jade Jiang and Naseem Ahmadpour. 2022. Beyond Immersion: Designing for Reflection in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 33rd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Melbourne, VIC, Australia) (OzCHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 208–220. doi: 10.1145/3520495.3520501 - Jiang and Hayama (2026) Jixiang Jiang and Yasuyuki Hayama. 2026. Designing for co-becoming: Toward a relational and pluriversal design ethic. The Design Journal (2026). doi: 10.1080/14606925.2025.2603597 - Jiang et al. (2023a) Jixiang Jiang, Yizao Wu, and Shu Zhang. 2023a. Implementation of design tools for relational thinking in design for social innovation-a pluralistic perspective from Weitou Village’s oyster reef restoration project. In Service Design and Innovation Conference. 951–980. - Jiang et al. (2023b) Jixiang Jiang, Wu Yizao, and Shu Zhang. 2023b. Exploring and facilitating Daoism’s contributions to design prototype, a case study from a "More-than-Human" social innovation project: Hokkhi. doi: 10.21606/iasdr.2023.100 - Jung et al. (2025) Yeohyun Jung, Kwangyoung Lee, and Hwajung Hong. 2025. Thinking Outside the Data Box: Investigating the Potential of Data Manipulation for Self-Reflection on Personal Data. In Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 2189–2207. - Kant (2000) Immanuel Kant. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Cambridge University Press. - Kaptelinin (2018) Victor Kaptelinin. 2018. Technology and the givens of existence: Toward an existential inquiry framework in HCI research. In Proceedings of the 2018 Chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–14. - Karaturhan et al. (2024) Pelin Karaturhan, İlayda Orhan, Kemal Kuşcu, and Asım Evren Yantaç. 2024. Informing the design of question-asking conversational agents for reflection. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 28, 6 (2024), 1001–1019. - Kersten-van Dijk et al. (2017) Elisabeth T Kersten-van Dijk, Joyce HDM Westerink, Femke Beute, and Wijnand A IJsselsteijn. 2017. Personal informatics, self-insight, and behavior change: A critical review of current literature. Human–Computer Interaction 32, 5-6 (2017), 268–296. - Khovanskaya et al. (2013) Vera Khovanskaya, Eric PS Baumer, Dan Cosley, Stephen Voida, and Geri Gay. 2013. " Everybody knows what you’re doing" a critical design approach to personal informatics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3403–3412. - Kim et al. (2023) Raphael Kim, Clarice Risseeuw, Eduard Georges Groutars, and Elvin Karana. 2023. Surfacing livingness in microbial displays: A design taxonomy for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–21. - Kim et al. (2022) Taewan Kim, Haesoo Kim, Ha Yeon Lee, Hwarang Goh, Shakhboz Abdigapporov, Mingon Jeong, Hyunsung Cho, Kyungsik Han, Youngtae Noh, Sung-Ju Lee, et al. 2022. Prediction for retrospection: Integrating algorithmic stress prediction into personal informatics systems for college students’ mental health. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–20. - Kim et al. (2016) Young-Ho Kim, Jae Ho Jeon, Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, KwonHyun Kim, and Jinwook Seo. 2016. TimeAware: Leveraging framing effects to enhance personal productivity. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 272–283. - Kirkland (1997) Russell Kirkland. 1997. The Taoism of the western imagination and the Taoism of China: De-colonializing the exotic teachings of the East. Presented at the University of Tennessee (1997). - Knightly (2013) Nickolas Knightly. 2013. The paradox of wuwei? Yes (and no). Asian Philosophy 23, 2 (2013), 115–136. - Kocielnik et al. (2018) Rafal Kocielnik, Lillian Xiao, Daniel Avrahami, and Gary Hsieh. 2018. Reflection companion: a conversational system for engaging users in reflection on physical activity. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 2 (2018), 1–26. - Kohn (2005) Livia Kohn. 2005. Health and Long Life the Chinese Way. Three Pine Press. - Kohn (2009) Livia Kohn. 2009. Being at one with heaven and earth: The ethical integration of self, society, and nature in Daoism. JL Phil. & Culture 3 (2009), 365. - Kozubaev and Howell (2024) Sandjar Kozubaev and Noura Howell. 2024. “Tuning in and listening to the current”: Understanding Remote Ritual Practice in Sufi Communities. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 2633–2648. - Krausová et al. (2013) A Krausová, H Hazan, J Romportl, P Ircing, E Zackova, M Polak, and R Schuster. 2013. Beyond AI: Artificial golem intelligence. Proceedings of the International Conference Beyond AI 2013. (2013). - Laozi and Lau (2003) Laozi and D C Lau. 2003. Tao te ching. Penguin, London. - Law et al. (2015) Effie Lai-Chong Law, Chaklam Silpasuwanchai, Xiangshi Ren, Jeffrey Bardzell, Torkil Clemmensen, and Yan Liu. 2015. Leveraging and Integrating Eastern and Western Insights for Human Engagement Studies in HCI. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI EA ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2433–2436. doi: 10.1145/2702613.2702642 - Lee et al. (2023) Ken Jen Lee, Adrian Davila, Hanlin Cheng, Joslin Goh, Elizabeth Nilsen, and Edith Law. 2023. “We need to do more… I need to do more”: Augmenting Digital Media Consumption via Critical Reflection to Increase Compassion and Promote Prosocial Attitudes and Behaviors. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 1–20. - Leigh and Bailey (2013) Jennifer Leigh and Richard Bailey. 2013. Reflection, reflective practice and embodied reflective practice. Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy 8, 3 (2013), 160–171. - Li et al. (2010) Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 557–566. doi: 10.1145/1753326.1753409 - Li et al. (2024) Jingjin Li, Karen Anne Cochrane, and Gilly Leshed. 2024. Beyond meditation: Understanding everyday mindfulness practices and technology use among experienced practitioners. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 8, CSCW2 (2024), 1–29. - Li (2025) Luyao Li. 2025. Responsive Harmony in the Zhuangzi. Religions 16, 1 (2025), 83. - Light et al. (2017) Ann Light, Alison Powell, and Irina Shklovski. 2017. Design for Existential Crisis in the Anthropocene Age. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (Troyes, France) (C&T ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 270–279. doi: 10.1145/3083671.3083688 - Lim et al. (2019) Catherine Y Lim, Andrew BL Berry, Andrea L Hartzler, Tad Hirsch, David S Carrell, Zoë A Bermet, and James D Ralston. 2019. Facilitating self-reflection about values and self-care among individuals with chronic conditions. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12. - Lindtner et al. (2018) Silvia Lindtner, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2018. Design and Intervention in the Age of" No Alternative". Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1–21. - Liu (2008) Chengji Liu. 2008. The body and its image in classical Chinese aesthetics. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3, 4 (2008), 577–594. - Liu (2006) JeeLoo Liu. 2006. An introduction to Chinese philosophy: From ancient philosophy to Chinese Buddhism. Blackwell Publishing. - Liu (2016) Jing Liu. 2016. What is nature?–ziran in early Daoist thinking. Asian Philosophy 26, 3 (2016), 265–279. - Liu (1996) Xiaogan Liu. 1996. A new interpretation of the concept of nature and non-action. Chinese Social Sciences 6 (1996), 136–149. - Liu (2014) Xiaogan Liu. 2014. Dao companion to Daoist philosophy. Springer. - Livio and Devendorf (2022) Maya Livio and Laura Devendorf. 2022. The eco-technical interface: Attuning to the instrumental. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–12. - Loerakker et al. (2024) Meagan B. Loerakker, Jasmin Niess, and Paweł W. Woźniak. 2024. Technology which Makes You Think: The Reflection, Rumination and Thought in Technology Scale. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 8, 2, Article 59 (May 2024), 24 pages. doi: 10.1145/3659615 - Loke and Schiphorst (2018) Lian Loke and Thecla Schiphorst. 2018. The somatic turn in human-computer interaction. Interactions 25, 5 (2018), 54–5863. - Lu et al. (2023) Alex Jiahong Lu, Shruti Sannon, Cameron Moy, Savana Brewer, Jaye Green, Kisha N Jackson, Daivon Reeder, Camaria Wafer, Mark S Ackerman, and Tawanna R Dillahunt. 2023. Participatory Noticing through Photovoice: Engaging Arts-and Community-Based Approaches in Design Research. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 2489–2508. - Luo et al. (2025) Yuhan Luo, Xinning Gui, Xianghua(Sharon) Ding, Xi Zheng, Rie Helene (Lindy) Hernandez, Zhuoyang Li, and Qiurong Song. 2025. Reflecting Upon The Unintended Consequences of Personal Informatics Systems: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies. In Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2847–2866. doi: 10.1145/3715336.3735746 - Lupton (2017) Deborah Lupton. 2017. Feeling your data: Touch and making sense of personal digital data. New media & society 19, 10 (2017), 1599–1614. - Lynn (2022) Richard John Lynn. 2022. Zhuangzi: A new translation of the sayings of Master Zhuang as interpreted by Guo Xiang. Columbia University Press. - Lyu et al. (2025) Bolin Lyu, Zhuying Li, Pengcheng An, and Josh Andres. 2025. LumaDreams: Designing Positive Dream Meaning-Making for Daily Empowerment. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–20. - Mah et al. (2021) Kristina Mah, Lian Loke, and Luke Hespanhol. 2021. Towards a contemplative research framework for training self-observation in HCI: A study of compassion cultivation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 28, 6 (2021), 1–27. - Mah et al. (2025) Kristina Mah, Evgenii A Timofeev, and Janghee Cho. 2025. The Future of Rest: A More-Than-Human Manifesto. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 647, 9 pages. doi: 10.1145/3706599.3716225 - Markum and Toyama (2020) Robert B Markum and Kentaro Toyama. 2020. Digital technology, meditative and contemplative practices, and transcendent experiences. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–14. - Markum et al. (2024) Robert B Markum, Sara Wolf, Caroline Claisse, and Michael Hoefer. 2024. Mediating the sacred: Configuring a design space for religious and spiritual tangible interactive artifacts. In Proceedings of the eighteenth international conference on tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction. 1–22. - Matthyssen (2025) Mieke Matthyssen. 2025. The “fasting of the heart”(xinzhai 心斋): Zhuangzi, Daoism and its transformative healing power in contemporary psychotherapy. Review of General Psychology 29, 2 (2025), 186–198. - Mekler and Hornbæk (2019) Elisa D. Mekler and Kasper Hornbæk. 2019. A framework for the experience of meaning in human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1–15. - Merleau-Ponty (1945) Maurice Merleau-Ponty. 1945. Phenomenology of perception. Forgotten Books, London. - Mezirow et al. (1990) Jack Mezirow et al. 1990. How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. Fostering critical reflection in adulthood 1, 20 (1990), 1–6. - Miller (2003) James Miller. 2003. Daoism and nature. In Nature Across Cultures: views of nature and the environment in non-western cultures. Springer, 393–409. - Mols et al. (2016) Ine Mols, Elise van den Hoven, and Berry Eggen. 2016. Technologies for Everyday Life Reflection: Illustrating a Design Space. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (TEI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 53–61. doi: 10.1145/2839462.2839466 - Mols et al. (2020) Ine Mols, Elise van den Hoven, and Berry Eggen. 2020. Everyday Life Reflection: Exploring Media Interaction with Balance, Cogito & Dott. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Sydney NSW, Australia) (TEI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 67–79. doi: 10.1145/3374920.3374928 - Moon (2013) Jennifer A Moon. 2013. Reflection in learning and professional development: Theory and practice. Routledge. - Murnane et al. (2018) Elizabeth L. Murnane, Tara G. Walker, Beck Tench, Stephen Voida, and Jaime Snyder. 2018. Personal Informatics in Interpersonal Contexts: Towards the Design of Technology that Supports the Social Ecologies of Long-Term Mental Health Management. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 127 (Nov. 2018), 27 pages. doi: 10.1145/3274396 - Nepal et al. (2024) Subigya Nepal, Arvind Pillai, William Campbell, Talie Massachi, Michael V. Heinz, Ashmita Kunwar, Eunsol Soul Choi, Xuhai Xu, Joanna Kuc, Jeremy F. Huckins, Jason Holden, Sarah M. Preum, Colin Depp, Nicholas Jacobson, Mary P. Czerwinski, Eric Granholm, and Andrew T. Campbell. 2024. MindScape Study: Integrating LLM and Behavioral Sensing for Personalized AI-Driven Journaling Experiences. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 8, 4, Article 186 (Nov. 2024), 44 pages. doi: 10.1145/3699761 - Nisbett (2010) Richard Nisbett. 2010. The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently… and. Simon and Schuster. - Nojonen (2019) Matti Nojonen. 2019. Dao: Cosmological Thinking and Social Practice. NoFo 17 (2019), 106. - Norman (2014) Don Norman. 2014. Things that make us smart. Diversion Books. - Núñez-Pacheco (2018) Claudia Núñez-Pacheco. 2018. Reflection through inner presence: A sensitising concept for design. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2, 1 (2018), 5. - Núñez-Pacheco and Poikolainen Rosén (2024) Claudia Núñez-Pacheco and Anton Poikolainen Rosén. 2024. Articulating felt senses for more-than-human design: A viewpoint for noticing. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1029–1043. - Núñez-Pacheco et al. (2025) Claudia Núñez-Pacheco, Pedro Sanches, and Jorge Olivares-Retamal. 2025. Searching for the Words that" Feel Right": Resonating with our Bodies and Felt Senses Through Haiku and Large Language Models (LLMs). In Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 2901–2915. - Odom et al. (2012a) William Odom, Richard Banks, Abigail Durrant, David Kirk, and James Pierce. 2012a. Slow technology: critical reflection and future directions. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 816–817. - Odom et al. (2012b) William Odom, Mark Selby, Abigail Sellen, David Kirk, Richard Banks, and Tim Regan. 2012b. Photobox: on the design of a slow technology. In Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference. 665–668. - Odom et al. (2019) William Odom, Ron Wakkary, Jeroen Hol, Bram Naus, Pepijn Verburg, Tal Amram, and Amy Yo Sue Chen. 2019. Investigating slowness as a frame to design longer-term experiences with personal data: A field study of olly. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–16. - Odom et al. (2020) William Odom, MinYoung Yoo, Henry Lin, Tijs Duel, Tal Amram, and Amy Yo Sue Chen. 2020. Exploring the Reflective Potentialities of Personal Data with Different Temporal Modalities: A Field Study of Olo Radio. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 283–295. doi: 10.1145/3357236.3395438 - Ofer et al. (2021) Netta Ofer, Fiona Bell, and Mirela Alistar. 2021. Designing direct interactions with bioluminescent algae. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1230–1241. - Oogjes and Wakkary (2022) Doenja Oogjes and Ron Wakkary. 2022. Weaving stories: Toward repertoires for designing things. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–21. - Ott (2024) Margus Ott. 2024. Embodiment Theory and Chinese Philosophy. Bloomsbury Publishing. - Park et al. (2025) Soobin Park, Hankyung Kim, and Youn-kyung Lim. 2025. Reimagining Personal Data: Unlocking the Potential of AI-Generated Images in Personal Data Meaning-Making. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–25. - Peng (2025) Bo Peng. 2025. Embodying the Cosmos: Taoism Bodily Philosophy, Chinese Medicine, and Relational Body. Recherches & éducations 30-31 (2025). - Pickering (2017) Andrew Pickering. 2017. The ontological turn: Taking different worlds seriously. Social Analysis 61, 2 (2017), 134–150. - Pickering (2019) Andrew Pickering. 2019. Poiesis in action: doing without knowledge. Weak Knowledge: Forms, Functions, and Dynamics. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag (2019), 61–84. - Ploderer et al. (2014) Bernd Ploderer, Wolfgang Reitberger, Harri Oinas-Kukkonen, and Julia van Gemert-Pijnen. 2014. Social interaction and reflection for behaviour change. Personal and ubiquitous computing 18, 7 (2014), 1667–1676. - Prpa et al. (2018) Mirjana Prpa, Kıvanç Tatar, Jules Françoise, Bernhard Riecke, Thecla Schiphorst, and Philippe Pasquier. 2018. Attending to breath: exploring how the cues in a virtual environment guide the attention to breath and shape the quality of experience to support mindfulness. In Proceedings of the 2018 designing interactive systems conference. 71–84. - Pschetz and Banks (2013) Larissa Pschetz and Richard Banks. 2013. Long living chair. In CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2983–2986. - Rajcic and McCormack (2020) Nina Rajcic and Jon McCormack. 2020. Mirror ritual: An affective interface for emotional self-reflection. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–13. - Rajcic and McCormack (2023) Nina Rajcic and Jon McCormack. 2023. Message ritual: a posthuman account of living with lamp. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–16. - Rapp and Boldi (2023) Amon Rapp and Arianna Boldi. 2023. Exploring the lived experience of behavior change technologies: Towards an existential model of behavior change for HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 30, 6 (2023), 1–50. - Rapp and Tirassa (2017) Amon Rapp and Maurizio Tirassa. 2017. Know thyself: a theory of the self for personal informatics. Human–Computer Interaction 32, 5-6 (2017), 335–380. - Sanches et al. (2022) Pedro Sanches, Noura Howell, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Tom Jenkins, and Karey Helms. 2022. Diffraction-in-action: designerly explorations of agential realism through lived data. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–18. - Sartre et al. (2022) Jean-Paul Sartre, Sarah Richmond, and Richard Moran. 2022. Being and nothingness: An essay in phenomenological ontology. Routledge. - Sas and Dix (2009) Corina Sas and Alan Dix. 2009. Designing for reflection on experience. In CHI’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 4741–4744. - Sas and Whittaker (2013) Corina Sas and Steve Whittaker. 2013. Design for forgetting: disposing of digital possessions after a breakup. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1823–1832. - Sathya and Nakagaki (2024) Anup Sathya and Ken Nakagaki. 2024. Attention Receipts: Utilizing the Materiality of Receipts to Improve Screen-time Reflection on YouTube. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–16. - Schön (1984) Donald A. Schön. 1984. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York, NY. - Schroeder (2022) Brian Schroeder. 2022. The way of becoming-imperceptible: Daoism, Deleuze, and inner transformation. Comparative and Continental Philosophy 14, 1 (2022), 8–29. - Sengers et al. (2005) Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph ‘Jofish’ Kaye. 2005. Reflective design. In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility (Aarhus, Denmark) (CC ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 49–58. doi: 10.1145/1094562.1094569 - Sengers and Gaver (2006) Phoebe Sengers and Bill Gaver. 2006. Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems. 99–108. - Serrán-Pagán y Fuentes (2013) C Serrán-Pagán y Fuentes. 2013. The mystical teaching of Wu-wei in the Dao De Jing: A comparative study of east and west on spiritual detachment Merton. Merton & the Tao: Dialogues with John Wu and the Ancient Sages (2013). - Shi et al. (2024) Yang Shi, Yechun Peng, Shengqi Dang, Nanxuan Zhao, and Nan Cao. 2024. Personalizing products with stylized head portraits for self-expression. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–18. - Shih (1919) Hu Shih. 1919. Outline of the History of Chinese Philosophy. - Shusterman (2015) Richard Shusterman. 2015. Somaesthetics and Chinese philosophy: Between unity and pragmatist pluralism. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 10, 2 (2015), 201–211. - Singh (2010) Michael Singh. 2010. Connecting intellectual projects in China and Australia: Bradley’s international student-migrants, Bourdieu and productive ignorance. Australian Journal of Education 54, 1 (2010), 31–45. - Slingerland (2007) Edward Slingerland. 2007. Effortless action: Wu-wei as conceptual metaphor and spiritual ideal in early China. Oxford University Press. - Slingerland (2019) Edward Slingerland. 2019. Mind and body in early China: Beyond orientalism and the myth of holism. Oxford University Press. - Slovák et al. (2017) Petr Slovák, Christopher Frauenberger, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2017. Reflective practicum: A framework of sensitising concepts to design for transformative reflection. In Proceedings of the 2017 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 2696–2707. - Smeets et al. (2014) Elke Smeets, Kristin Neff, Hugo Alberts, and Madelon Peters. 2014. Meeting suffering with kindness: Effects of a brief self-compassion intervention for female college students. Journal of clinical psychology 70, 9 (2014), 794–807. - Smith (2006) David Geoffrey Smith. 2006. Trying to teach in a season of great untruth: Globalization, empire and the crises of pedagogy. Vol. 2. Sense Publishers. - Smith et al. (2017) Nancy Smith, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2017. Designing for cohabitation: Naturecultures, hybrids, and decentering the human in design. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1714–1725. - Soden et al. (2022) Robert Soden, Laura Devendorf, Richmond Wong, Yoko Akama, and Ann Light. 2022. Modes of Uncertainty in HCI. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction 15, 4 (2022), 317–426. doi: 10.1561/1100000085 - Somanath et al. (2022) Sowmya Somanath, Ron Wakkary, Omid Ettehadi, Henry Lin, Armi Behzad, Jordan Eshpeter, and Doenja Oogjes. 2022. Exploring the composite intentionality of 3D printers and makers in digital fabrication. International Journal of Design 16, 3 (2022), 77–95. - Song et al. (2022) Katherine W Song, Aditi Maheshwari, Eric M Gallo, Andreea Danielescu, and Eric Paulos. 2022. Towards decomposable interactive systems: Design of a backyard-degradable wireless heating interface. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12. - Spiel et al. (2018) Katta Spiel, Fares Kayali, Louise Horvath, Michael Penkler, Sabine Harrer, Miguel Sicart, and Jessica Hammer. 2018. Fitter, happier, more productive? The normative ontology of fitness trackers. In Extended abstracts of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–10. - Stefanidi et al. (2024) Evropi Stefanidi, Nadine Wagener, Dustin Augsten, Andy Augsten, Leon Reicherts, Paweł W. Woźniak, Johannes Schöning, Yvonne Rogers, and Jasmin Niess. 2024. TeenWorlds: Supporting Emotional Expression for Teenagers with their Parents and Peers through a Collaborative VR Experience. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Trier, Germany) (VRST ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 28, 14 pages. doi: 10.1145/3641825.3687754 - Stokes (2016) Patrick Stokes. 2016. The problem of spontaneous goodness: From Kierkegaard to Løgstrup (via Zhuangzi and Eckhart). Continental Philosophy Review 49, 2 (2016), 139–159. - Su and Stolterman (2016) Norman Makoto Su and Erik Stolterman. 2016. A design approach for authenticity and technology. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 643–655. - Sun et al. (2025) Yuling Sun, Wenjing Yue, Xiaofu Jin, Shuai Ma, Xiaojuan Ma, and Xiaoling Wang. 2025. When Traditional Medicine Meets AI: Critical Considerations for AI-Empowered Clinical Support in Traditional Medicine. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 9, 7 (2025), 1–37. - Tan (2020a) Charlene Tan. 2020a. The learning school through a Daoist lens. Oxford Review of Education 46, 3 (2020), 393–407. - Tan (2020b) Charlene Tan. 2020b. Revisiting Donald Schön’s notion of reflective practice: A Daoist interpretation. Reflective Practice 21, 5 (2020), 686–698. - Tan and Bao (2024) Jing Tan and Xiangfei Bao. 2024. Reflecting on the distinction between philosophical Daoism and religious Daoism based on the transmission and transformation of the concept of “philosophy”. Religions 15, 1 (2024), 77. - Tang (2016) Junyi Tang. 2016. On the Origins of Chinese Philosophy: Retracing the Concept of Teaching. Complete Works of Tang Junyi (2016). - Tao (2011) Jiang Tao. 2011. Two Notions of Freedom in classical Chinese thought: The concept of Hua 化 in the Zhuangzi and the Xunzi. Dao 10, 4 (2011), 463–486. - Terzimehić et al. (2019) Nađa Terzimehić, Christopher Lueg, Susanne Boll, and Jürgen Beel. 2019. A review & analysis of mindfulness research in HCI: Framing current lines of research and future opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1–13. - Thompson and Pascal (2012) Neil Thompson and Jan Pascal. 2012. Developing critically reflective practice. Reflective practice 13, 2 (2012), 311–325. - Thudt et al. (2018) Alice Thudt, Uta Hinrichs, Samuel Huron, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2018. Self-reflection and personal physicalization construction. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–13. - Toebosch et al. (2024) Romain Toebosch, Arne Berger, and Carine Lallemand. 2024. Non-judgmental interfaces: A new design space for personal informatics. In Companion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 166–170. - Tomico et al. (2025) Oscar Tomico, Doenja Oogjes, and Ron Wakkary. 2025. Constituency as a Matter of Practice: Moving a Plant Studio. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–17. - Tricker (2022) Christopher Tricker. 2022. The cicada and the bird: The usefulness of a useless philosophy. Chuang Tzu’s ancient wisdom translated for modern life. Christopher Tricker. - Tsaknaki et al. (2021) Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Kelsey Cotton, Pavel Karpashevich, and Pedro Sanches. 2021. “Feeling the Sensor Feeling you”: A Soma Design Exploration on Sensing Non-habitual Breathing. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–16. - Tsing (2015) Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing. 2015. The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. In The Mushroom at the End of the World. Princeton University Press. - Turner (2022) Kevin J. Turner. 2022. On the Human in the Zhuangzi’s Concept of Qi. Philosophy East and West 72, 4 (Oct 2022), 1089–1108. doi: 10.1353/pew.2022.0082 - van den Berg et al. (2025) Merel KN van den Berg, Armağan Karahanoğlu, Matthijs L Noordzij, Els LM Maeckelberghe, and Geke DS Ludden. 2025. Why we should stress about stress scores: issues and directions for wearable stress-tracking technology. Interacting with Computers (2025), iwaf036. - van Dijk et al. (2016) Elisabeth Kersten van Dijk, Wijnand IJsselsteijn, and Joyce Westerink. 2016. Deceptive visualizations and user bias: a case for personalization and ambiguity in PI visualizations. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (Heidelberg, Germany) (UbiComp ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 588–593. doi: 10.1145/2968219.2968326 - Van Koningsbruggen et al. (2024) Rosa Van Koningsbruggen, Bart Hengeveld, and Eva Hornecker. 2024. The Secret Life of Data–Uncovering the Diverse, Lived, and More-Than-Human Nature of Personal Data. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition. 438–451. - Verbeek (2006) Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2006. Materializing morality: Design ethics and technological mediation. Science, Technology, & Human Values 31, 3 (2006), 361–380. - Wagener et al. (2025) Nadine Wagener, Daniel Christian Albensoeder, Leon Reicherts, Paweł W. Woźniak, Yvonne Rogers, and Jasmin Niess. 2025. TogetherReflect: Supporting Emotional Expression in Couples Through a Collaborative Virtual Reality Experience. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1130, 16 pages. doi: 10.1145/3706598.3713642 - Wagener et al. (2024) Nadine Wagener, Arne Kiesewetter, Leon Reicherts, Paweł W. Woźniak, Johannes Schöning, Yvonne Rogers, and Jasmin Niess. 2024. MoodShaper: A Virtual Reality Experience to Support Managing Negative Emotions. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Copenhagen, Denmark) (DIS ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2286–2304. doi: 10.1145/3643834.3661570 - Wagener et al. (2023) Nadine Wagener, Leon Reicherts, Nima Zargham, Natalia Bartłomiejczyk, Ava Elizabeth Scott, Katherine Wang, Marit Bentvelzen, Evropi Stefanidi, Thomas Mildner, Yvonne Rogers, et al. 2023. SelVReflect: A guided VR experience fostering reflection on personal challenges. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–17. - Wakkary (2020) Ron Wakkary. 2020. Nomadic practices: A posthuman theory for knowing design. International Journal of Design 14, 3 (2020), 117–128. - Wakkary (2021) Ron Wakkary. 2021. Things We Could Design: For More Than Human-Centered Worlds. MIT Press. - Wakkary et al. (2022) Ron Wakkary, Doenja Oogjes, and Armi Behzad. 2022. Two years or more of co-speculation: polylogues of philosophers, designers, and a tilting bowl. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 29, 5 (2022), 1–44. - Wang and Lou (2008) Bi Wang and Yulie Lou. 2008. 老子道德經注校釋. 中華書局. - Wang (2025) Cheng Wang. 2025. Harmonizing Diversity: Insights from Zhuangzi’s Concept of Zhi 知. Religions 16, 3 (2025), 353. - Wang (2022) Kai Wang. 2022. The Yin–Yang definition model of mental health: The mental health definition in Chinese culture. Frontiers in psychology 13 (2022), 832076. - Watson (2013) Burton Watson. 2013. The complete works of Zhuangzi. Columbia University Press. - Watts (1977) Alan Watts. 1977. Tao: The watercourse way. Pantheon. - Wenning (2011) Mario Wenning. 2011. Daoism as Critical Theory. Comparative Philosophy 2, 2 (2011), 50–71. - Whitehead (1929) Alfred North Whitehead. 1929. Process and Reality. Free Press. - Wilde et al. (2017) Danielle Wilde, Anna Vallgårda, and Oscar Tomico. 2017. Embodied Design Ideation Methods: Analysing the Power of Estrangement. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5158–5170. doi: 10.1145/3025453.3025873 - Ye (1985) Lang Ye. 1985. Zhongguo meixueshi dagang (An Outline History of Chinese Aesthetics). Shanghai Renmin Chubanshe, Shanghai. - Ying (2007) Chen Gu Ying. 2007. 庄子今注今译 / Zhuang zi jin zhu jin yi. Shang Wu Yin Shu Guan, 商务印书馆, Bei Jing. - Yip (2004) Kam-Shing Yip. 2004. Taoism and its impact on mental health of the Chinese communities. International journal of social psychiatry 50, 1 (2004), 25–42. - Yoo et al. (2025) MinYoung Yoo, Sophia Ppali, William Odom, Yumeng Zhuang, Kritika Kritika, Wyatt Olson, Catherine Wieczorek, Heidi Biggs, Arne Berger, Audrey Desjardins, et al. 2025. Translating HCI Research to Broader Audiences: Motivation, Inspiration, and Critical Factors on Alternative Research Outcomes. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–24. - Zhang (2025) Ellen Y Zhang. 2025. Implications of AI Chatbots for Human Relationships: A Perspective from Daoism. In Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Human Relations: Eastern and Western Perspectives. Springer, 117–132. - Zhang (2008) Weiwen Zhang. 2008. Religious Daoist Studies of The Book of Changes (Yi jing) and Their Historical and Contemporary Influence. Contemporary Chinese Thought 39, 3 (2008), 74–97. - Zhao (2020) Weili Zhao. 2020. Eastern ethico-onto-epistemologies as a diffracting return: Implications for post-qualitative pedagogy and research. In Navigating the postqualitative, new materialist and critical posthumanist terrain across disciplines. Routledge, 85–98. - Zhao and Murris (2021) Weili Zhao and Karin Murris. 2021. Dao and qi. In A glossary for doing postqualitative, new materialist and critical posthumanist research across disciplines. Routledge, 46–47. - Zhong et al. (2025) Ce Zhong, Xiang Li, Xizi Wang, Junwei Sun, and Jian Zhao. 2025. Investigating Composite Relation with a Data-Physicalized Thing through the Deployment of the WavData Lamp. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–21. - Zhu et al. (2017) Bin Zhu, Anders Hedman, and Haibo Li. 2017. Designing digital mindfulness: Presence-in and presence-with versus presence-through. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 4655–4666. - Zhu et al. (2025) Jichen Zhu, Pedro Sanches, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Willem Van Der Maden, and Irene Kaklopoulou. 2025. The Centers and Margins of Modeling Humans in Well-being Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–16. - Zhu (2002) Rui Zhu. 2002. Wu-Wei: Lao-zi, Zhuang-zi and the aesthetic judgement. Asian Philosophy 12, 1 (2002), 53–63. - Zi and Mitchell (2018) Lao Zi and Damo Mitchell. 2018. Lao Zi - Dao De Jing. The Classic of the Way and Virtue. Lost Mountain Books. ## Appendix A A comparative table of the original Daoist text and English translations Since there are numerous English translations of the Dao De Jing and the Zhuangzi, this paper adopts D.C. Lau’s widely circulated translation of the Dao De Jing. Table 4 presents the selected verses in the order of their appearance in this paper, compared against the Mawangdui manuscript edition (annotated by Wang Bi) (Wang and Lou, 2008) as well as the version by Damo Mitchell (Zi and Mitchell, 2018), which has also been used in the CHI community by Mah et al. (Mah et al., 2025). For the Zhuangzi, we likewise chose Burton Watson’s English translation (Watson, 2013) and compare it with the original Chinese text (Ying, 2007) (see Table 5). Table 4. Comparison of Dao De Jing Verses: Chinese Original and English Translations | 01 | 道可道, 非常道; | The way that can be spoken of, Is not the constant way; | The Dao that can be trodden is not an unchanging Dao. | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 02 | 是以聖人處無為之事, 行不言之教, | Therefore the sage…practises the teaching that uses no words. | This is why the sage practices Wu-Wei and teaches that which is unspoken. | | 04 | 道冲而用之或不盈。 | The way is empty, yet use will not drain it. | Dao is void and yet can be drawn upon without ever becoming exhausted. | | 10 | 專氣至柔, 能嬰兒乎? | In concentrating your breath can you become as supple As a babe? | Can you gather the Qi until it is as pliable as a newborn infant? | | 13 | 吾所以有大患者, 為吾有身。 | The reason I have great trouble is that I have a body. When I no longer have a body, what trouble have I? | We only suffer with these things because of our sense of self; if there is no self, how can we suffer so? | | 15 | 敦兮其若樸; | Thick like the uncarved block; | They are as simple as an uncarved block of wood. | | 25 | 有物混成,先天地生, 寂兮寥兮,獨立不改, 周行而不殆, 可以為天下母. … 人法地, 地法天, 天法道, 道法自然。 | There is a thing confusedly formed, Born before heaven and earth. Silent and void It stands alone and does not change, Goes round and does not weary. … Man models himself on earth, Earth on heaven, Heaven on the way, And the way on that which is naturally so. | Before Heaven and Earth was chaotic emptiness; it exists still, since it is everlasting. It is both formless and soundless. It does not grow weary and operates endlessly. It is the mother of Heaven and all beneath it. … But all men must follow the way of Earth. Earth must follow the way of Heaven, Heaven must follow the way of Dao. In turn, Dao must follow the way of true self-nature. | | 28 | 常德不離, 復歸於嬰兒。 | Then the constant virtue will not desert you And you will again return to being a babe. | This ravine beneath Heaven brings forth De. This is the state of reverting to infancy. | | 37 | 道常無為而無不為, 侯王若能守之, 萬物將自化。 | The way never acts yet nothing is left undone. Should lords and princes be able to hold fast to it, The myriad creatures will be transformed of their own accord. | Dao adheres to Wu-Wei, and then all things are done. If the princes and kings could only adhere to Dao, the myriad beings would be spontaneously transformed. | | 40 | 返者, 道之動; 弱者, 道之用。 | Turning back is how the way moves; Weakness is the means the way employs. | ’Returning’ is the motion of Dao. Dao works through the receptive. | | 42 | 道生一, 一生二, 二生三, 三生萬物。 | The way begets one; one begets two; two begets three; three begets the myriad creatures. | From Dao comes the one, from the one comes two. Two produces three, and from the three emerge the myriad beings. | | 58 | 禍兮福之所倚。 | It is on disaster that good fortune perches. | Good fortune is rooted in calamity. | Table 5. Comparison of Zhuangzi Passages: Chinese Original and English Translation | 02 | 不知周之夢為胡蝶與，胡蝶之夢為周與？ | But he didn’t know if he was Chuang Chou who had dreamt he was a butterfly, or a butterfly dreaming he was Chuang Chou. | | --- | --- | --- | | 04 | 若一志, 無聽之以耳而聽之以心，無聽之以心而聽之以氣！ | Unify your attention. Rather than listen with the ear, listen with the heart. Rather than listen with the heart, listen with the energies. | | 06 | 至人之用心若鏡，不將不迎，應而不藏，故能勝物而不傷。 | The Perfect Man uses his mind like a mirror—going after nothing, welcoming nothing, responding but not storing. | | 12 | 有機械者必有機事，有機事者必有機心。機心存於胸中，則純白不備。 | Where there are machines, there are bound to be machine worries; where there are machine worries, there are bound to be machine hearts. With a machine heart in your breast, you’ve spoiled what was pure and simple; and without the pure and simple. | | 23 | 「能兒子乎？」兒子動不知所為，行不知所之，身若槁木之枝而心若死灰。 | “Can you be a baby?” The baby acts without knowing what it is doing, moves without knowing where it is going. Its body is like the limb of a withered tree, its mind like dead ashes. |