# Technical Document Extraction: Bar Chart Analysis
## 1. Chart Components
### Axis Labels
- **X-axis**: "Average Image Size Interval (width x height)"
- Categories:
- `(0,25]` (Total: 19)
- `(25,100]` (Total: 139)
- `(100,225]` (Total: 129)
- `(225,400]` (Total: 51)
- `(400,625]` (Total: 39)
- `(625,900]` (Total: 23)
- **Y-axis**: "Accuracy on *I<sub>t</sub>* (%)"
### Legend
- **Location**: Top-right corner
- **Categories**:
- `Gemini-2.0 RSPC` (Green)
- `Gemini-2.0 KAAR` (Light Green)
- `DeepSeek-R1-70B RSPC` (Orange)
- `DeepSeek-R1-70B KAAR` (Light Orange)
## 2. Data Points & Trends
### Spatial Grounding & Color Verification
- **Legend Colors Match Chart Bars**:
- Green = Gemini-2.0 RSPC
- Light Green = Gemini-2.0 KAAR
- Orange = DeepSeek-R1-70B RSPC
- Light Orange = DeepSeek-R1-70B KAAR
### Interval-by-Interval Analysis
#### `(0,25]` (Total: 19)
- **Gemini-2.0 RSPC**: 63.2% (Green)
- **DeepSeek-R1-70B RSPC**: 47.4% (Orange)
- **Gemini-2.0 KAAR**: 15.8% (Light Green)
- **DeepSeek-R1-70B KAAR**: 5.3% (Light Orange)
- **Trend**: Gemini-2.0 RSPC dominates; KAAR versions underperform.
#### `(25,100]` (Total: 139)
- **Gemini-2.0 RSPC**: 28.8% (Green)
- **DeepSeek-R1-70B RSPC**: 15.1% (Orange)
- **Gemini-2.0 KAAR**: 7.9% (Light Green)
- **DeepSeek-R1-70B KAAR**: 6.5% (Light Orange)
- **Trend**: Accuracy declines for all models, but Gemini-2.0 RSPC remains highest.
#### `(100,225]` (Total: 129)
- **Gemini-2.0 RSPC**: 9.3% (Green)
- **DeepSeek-R1-70B RSPC**: 0.8% (Orange)
- **Gemini-2.0 KAAR**: 4.7% (Light Green)
- **DeepSeek-R1-70B KAAR**: 7.0% (Light Orange)
- **Trend**: DeepSeek-R1-70B RSPC plummets; KAAR versions show minor recovery.
#### `(225,400]` (Total: 51)
- **Gemini-2.0 RSPC**: 5.9% (Green)
- **Gemini-2.0 KAAR**: 2.0% (Light Green)
- **DeepSeek-R1-70B Models**: No data points (assumed 0% or omitted)
- **Trend**: Gemini-2.0 RSPC retains marginal lead; KAAR versions negligible.
#### `(400,625]` and `(625,900]` (Totals: 39, 23)
- **No data points provided** for any model
- **Trend**: Likely no measurable accuracy for larger intervals
## 3. Overall Trends
- **Gemini-2.0 RSPC** consistently outperforms all models across intervals
- **KAAR versions** (both Gemini and DeepSeek) show significantly lower accuracy, with performance degrading as image size increases
- **DeepSeek-R1-70B RSPC** drops sharply in mid-sized intervals (e.g., 0.8% in `(100,225]`)
## 4. Critical Observations
- **Accuracy Degradation**: All models lose effectiveness as image size grows, but Gemini-2.0 RSPC maintains relative stability
- **KAAR Limitations**: KAAR configurations underperform RSPC by 3–5× in smaller intervals and become irrelevant in larger ones
- **Data Gaps**: No results for `(400,625]` and `(625,900]`, suggesting models fail entirely at extreme resolutions
## 5. Transcribed Text
- **Legend Labels**:
- `Gemini-2.0 RSPC`
- `Gemini-2.0 KAAR`
- `DeepSeek-R1-70B RSPC`
- `DeepSeek-R1-70B KAAR`
- **Axis Titles**:
- X: "Average Image Size Interval (width x height)"
- Y: "Accuracy on *I<sub>t</sub>* (%)"
## 6. Language Notes
- **Primary Language**: English
- **No Non-English Text Detected**
