## Diagram: Software Evaluation Workflow ### Overview The image is a diagram illustrating a software evaluation workflow, divided into three main stages: Input, Runtime, and Evaluation. It shows the flow of information and processes from initial requirements to final analysis. ### Components/Axes * **Input:** This stage represents the initial data and resources required for the process. * Elements: * "Feature Description" (light blue box) * "Figma Link" (light blue box with Figma logo) * "Product Requirement Document" (light blue box) * "Other Related Context (abtest/multi-lingo/etc)" (light blue box) * "Mobile Project Codebase (Swift/Objc/RN/etc)" (light red box with a flame icon) * **Runtime:** This stage represents the processing and execution phase. * Elements: * "Bench Runtime (Model Config/Tuned System Prompt/Task Management)" (light purple box) * "Figma MCP" (light purple box) * "Vision MCP" (light purple box) * "Coding Agent (Cursor/CC/Codex/etc)" (light purple box with icons) * **Evaluation:** This stage represents the analysis and assessment of the results. * Elements: * "Entrypoint-wise Eval" (light green box) * "Functionality-wise Eval" (light green box) * "Configuration-wise Eval" (light green box) * "Analyzer" (light green box) ### Detailed Analysis or Content Details * **Input Stage:** * The "Feature Description," "Figma Link," "Product Requirement Document," and "Other Related Context" all feed into the "Product Requirement Document." * The "Mobile Project Codebase" is a separate input. * All inputs feed into the "Runtime" stage. * **Runtime Stage:** * The "Bench Runtime" block is the central component. * "Figma MCP" and "Vision MCP" feed into the "Coding Agent." * The "Coding Agent" receives input from the "Bench Runtime." * The output of the "Coding Agent" is labeled "diff patches" and feeds into the "Evaluation" stage. * **Evaluation Stage:** * "Entrypoint-wise Eval," "Functionality-wise Eval," and "Configuration-wise Eval" all feed into the "Analyzer." * The "Analyzer" is the final step in the workflow. ### Key Observations * The diagram illustrates a sequential flow from Input to Runtime to Evaluation. * The "Coding Agent" in the Runtime stage appears to be a key component, receiving input from multiple sources. * The Evaluation stage involves multiple types of evaluation before the final analysis. ### Interpretation The diagram outlines a process for automatically evaluating software changes. The "Input" stage gathers all necessary information, including feature descriptions, design links (Figma), requirements, and the codebase. The "Runtime" stage uses this information to generate code changes ("diff patches") via a "Coding Agent," potentially leveraging models and configurations defined in the "Bench Runtime." The "Evaluation" stage then assesses these changes from different perspectives (entry point, functionality, configuration) before a final "Analyzer" provides a comprehensive evaluation. This suggests an automated system for testing and validating software modifications.